A Consensus Framework for Neurofeedback Research (and the Perils of Unfounded Neuroreductionism): Reply to Micoulaud-Franchi and Fovet (2018) REPLY

Thibault Robert T.; Raz Amir

首页> 外文期刊>The American psychologist >A Consensus Framework for Neurofeedback Research (and the Perils of Unfounded Neuroreductionism): Reply to Micoulaud-Franchi and Fovet (2018) REPLY

【24h】

A Consensus Framework for Neurofeedback Research (and the Perils of Unfounded Neuroreductionism): Reply to Micoulaud-Franchi and Fovet (2018) REPLY

机译：神经融合研究的互动框架（以及危险的神经团结）：回复Micoulaud-Franchi和Fovet（2018）回复

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

We were pleased to read the constructive commentary (Micoulaud-Franchi & Fovet, 2018) on our original piece (Thibault & Raz, 2017). In this response, we build on the theoretical framework for studying neurofeedback that the commentators sketch out while pointing out potential caveats to adopting a neuroreductionist approach.

机译：我们很高兴地阅读我们原始的作品（2018年Micoulaud-Franchi＆Fovet，2018）的建设性评论（Thibault＆Raz，2017）。在这种反应中，我们建立了学习神经融资的理论框架，即评论员在指出潜在的警告以采用神经团控制方法的同时。

著录项

来源
《The American psychologist》 |2018年第7期|共2页
作者
Thibault Robert T.; Raz Amir;
展开▼
作者单位

McGill Univ Integrated Program Neurosci Montreal PQ Canada;

Chapman Univ Inst Interdisciplinary Brain &

Behav Sci 14725 Alton Pkwy Irvine CA 92618 USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类心理学;
关键词
neurofeedback; EEG; psychiatry; neuroreductionism; placebo;

机译：Neurofeedback;脑电图;精神病学;神经团结诊断性;安慰剂;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A Consensus Framework for Neurofeedback Research (and the Perils of Unfounded Neuroreductionism): Reply to Micoulaud-Franchi and Fovet (2018) REPLY [J] . Thibault Robert T., Raz Amir The American psychologist . 2018,第7期

机译：神经融合研究的互动框架（以及危险的神经团结）：回复Micoulaud-Franchi和Fovet（2018）回复
2. Reply to Pirus Ghadjar and Thomas Wiegel's Letter to the Editor re: Daniel E. Spratt, Robert T. Dess, Zachary S. Zumsteg, et al. A Systematic Review and Framework for the Use of Hormone Therapy with Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2018;73:156-65 [J] . Spratt Daniel E., Dess Robert T., Feng Felix Y. European urology . 2018,第3期

机译：回复Pirus Ghadjar和Thomas Wiegel的信Re：Daniel E. Spratt，Robert T. Dess，Zachary S. Zumsteg等等。用于使用激素治疗的系统审查和框架，用于复制前列腺癌。 EUR UROL 2018; 73：156-65
3. Reply to the letter to the editor 'Reporting of HRQoL results from the PALOMA-2 trial: unfounded conclusions due to highly biased analyses' by Kaiser et al. [J] . Rugo H. S., Iyer S., Huang C. Annals of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology . 2018,第8期

机译：回复了编辑的信函的报告从Paloma-2试验中的HRQOL结果：由于高度偏见的分析因Kaiser等人而言而言。
4. Acknowledgement or reply? prosodic features for disambiguating pragmatic functions of the italian token #x2018;s#x00EC;#x2019; [C] . Savino Michelina, Refice Mario 2013 7th Conference on Speech Technology and Human - Computer Dialogue . 2013

机译：确认或回复？韵律特征，用于消除义大利语“sì”的语用功能
5. Reply to: Austin et al. CytoJournal 2009;6:12 (Unfounded claims mar scientific critique) [O] . Jose Jeronimo, Mark A Barone, Silvana Luciani, 2009

机译：回复：奥斯丁等。 CytoJournal 2009; 6：12（对科学批评的无根据的主张）
6. The Fallacy of Sham-Controlled Neurofeedback Trials: A Reply to Thibault and Colleagues (2018) [O] . H. Edmund Pigott, Rex Cannon, Mark Trullinger 2018

机译：假控神经融合态度试验的谬误：对Thibault和同事的回复（2018年）

A Consensus Framework for Neurofeedback Research (and the Perils of Unfounded Neuroreductionism): Reply to Micoulaud-Franchi and Fovet (2018) REPLY

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅