...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Telemedicine and e-health: the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association >What Is the Proportion of Studies Reporting Patient and Practitioner Satisfaction with Software Support Tools Used in the Management of Knee Pain and Is This Related to Sample Size, Effect Size, and Journal Impact Factor?
【24h】

What Is the Proportion of Studies Reporting Patient and Practitioner Satisfaction with Software Support Tools Used in the Management of Knee Pain and Is This Related to Sample Size, Effect Size, and Journal Impact Factor?

机译：报告报告患者和从业者满意与用于管理膝关节疼痛的软件支持工具的研究的比例是多少，并且是与样本大小，效果大小和期刊影响因子相关的？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Introduction:E-health software tools have been deployed in managing knee conditions. Reporting of patient and practitioner satisfaction in studies regarding e-health usage is not widely explored. The objective of this review was to identify studies describing patient and practitioner satisfaction with software use concerning knee pain.Materials and Methods:A computerized search was undertaken: four electronic databases were searched from January 2007 until January 2017. Key words were decision dashboard, clinical decision, Web-based resource, evidence support, and knee. Full texts were scanned for effect of size reporting and satisfaction scales from participants and practitioners. Binary regression was run; impact factor and sample size were predictors with indicators for satisfaction and effect size reporting as dependent variables.Results:Seventy-seven articles were retrieved; 37 studies were included in final analysis. Ten studies reported patient satisfaction ratings (27.8%): a single study reported both patient and practitioner satisfaction (2.8%). Randomized control trials were the most common design (35%) and knee osteoarthritis the most prevalent condition (38%). Electronic patient-reported outcome measures and Web-based training were the most common interventions. No significant dependency was found within the regression models (p 0.05).Discussion and Conclusions:The proportion of reporting of patient satisfaction was low; practitioner satisfaction was poorly represented. There may be implications for the suitability of administering e-health, a medium for capturing further meta-evidence needs to be established and used as best practice for implicated studies in future. This is the first review of its kind to address patient and practitioner satisfaction with knee e-health.
机译：简介：在管理膝盖条件中部署了电子卫生软件工具。关于电子卫生使用研究的患者和从业者满意度的报告并未得到广泛探索。本综述的目的是识别将患者和从业者满意的研究与膝关节疼痛的软件使用。决策，基于网络的资源，证据支持和膝关节。从参与者和从业者的大小报告和满意度衡量的效果扫描了全文。二进制回归运行;影响因子和样本大小是预测因子，具有满足和效果大小报告作为依赖变量的指标。结果：检索七十七种物品; 37项研究包括在最终分析中。 10项研究报告患者满意度评级（27.8％）：一项研究报告患者和从业者满意度（2.8％）。随机控制试验是最常见的设计（35％）和膝关节骨关节炎最普遍的病症（38％）。电子患者报告的结果措施和基于网络的培训是最常见的干预措施。在回归模型中没有发现显着的依赖（P＆GT; 0.05）。探讨和结论：患者满意度报告的比例低;从业者满意度很差。对于管理电子健康的适用性可能有所意义，需要建立一个捕获进一步的荟萃证据的媒介，并将未来牵连研究的最佳实践。这是对与膝关节电子健康的患者和从业者满意度解决患者和从业者的满意度的第一次审查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号