...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. >Paternite des articles et interets concurrents: une analyse des recommandations aux auteurs des journaux traitant de pratique pharmaceutique
【24h】

Paternite des articles et interets concurrents: une analyse des recommandations aux auteurs des journaux traitant de pratique pharmaceutique

机译：父亲竞争物品和兴趣：对与报纸的药物实践作者的建议分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Honorary and ghost authorship, as well as competing interests, are well documented concerns related to the publication of scientific articles. Guidelines for writing and publishing scientific manuscripts are available, including those of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Objectives: The primary objective of this descriptive cross-sectional study was to identify, in the instructions for authors of pharmacy practice journals, guidance on authorship and competing interests. The secondary objective was to suggest suitable corrective measures for more transparent authorship. Methods: The first step of the project was to identify journals in the area of pharmacy practice. The instructions for authors of each journal were then reviewed to determine recommendations for avoiding problems related to authorship and competing interests. Finally, the members of the research tea formulated potential corrective measures for researchers. Results: Of 232 pharmacy journals identified, 33 were deemed to focus on pharmacy practice. A total of 24 (73%) of these journals mentioned that they followed ICMJE policies, 14 (42%) asked authors to complete a competing interests disclosure form at the time of submission, 17 (52%) had a formal definition of authorship, and 5 (15%) asked for details of each authors contribution. A list of 40 criteria was developed to define authorship status. Conclusion: Fewer than half of the journals asked authors to provide a competing interests disclosure form upon submission of an article, and only half had a formal definition of authorship. The scientific publication of papers relevant to pharmacy practice is not free from issues related to publication transparency. Publishing articles online and using a checklist to detail each authors contribution may help to limit the associated risks.
机译：背景：荣誉和幽灵作者以及竞争利益，有关与科学文章的出版有关的令人担忧。提供书写和出版科学手稿的指南，包括国际医学期刊编辑委员会（ICMJE）。目的：这种描述性横断面研究的主要目标是在药房实践期刊的作者中识别，就作者和竞争利益的指导。二级目标是为更透明的作者提出适当的纠正措施。方法：该项目的第一步是识别药房实践领域的期刊。然后审查每个日记的作者指令以确定避免与作者和竞争利益有关的问题的建议。最后，研究茶叶的成员配制了研究人员的潜在纠正措施。结果：确定了232个药房期刊，33人被认为专注于药房实践。总共24个（73％）这些期刊提到，他们遵循ICMJE政策，14（42％）要求作者在提交时完成竞争利益披露表格，17（52％）有正式的作者定义， 5（15％）询问每个作者贡献的详情。开发了40个标准的列表以定义作者身份。结论：少于一半的期刊要求作者在提交文章后提供竞争利益披露表格，只有一半的作者定义。与药房实践相关的论文的科学出版物并不是没有与公布透明度相关的问题。在线发布文章并使用清单来详细介绍每个作者的贡献可能有助于限制相关的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号