• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The International journal of drug policy >Canada, cannabis and the relationship between UN child rights and drug control treaties
【24h】

Canada, cannabis and the relationship between UN child rights and drug control treaties

机译：加拿大，大麻和联合国儿童权利和药物管制条约之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Article 33 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child requires States to take appropriate measures to protect children from illicit drugs 'as defined in the relevant international treaties'. Those treaties are the UN drugs conventions. Following cannabis legalisation, then, can Canada remain in compliance with the CRC while breaching treaties to which Article 33 expressly refers? This article investigates this question with reference to the drafting of the CRC and the drugs conventions, how the relationship between the two systems has been approached, and the practice of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child from 1993-2015. While the CRC could offer an alternative framework through which to critically assess drug laws and policies, by and large it has operated so as to reinforce the drug control system. An interpretation of Article 33 in the light of Canada's cannabis reforms is proposed. Based on the text of the provision, the pacta tertiis rule, and the object and purpose of the provision, it decouples the CRC from the normative requirements of the drugs conventions.
机译：联合国儿童权利公约第三十三条要求各国采取适当措施保护相关国际条约中所定义的非法药物的儿童。这些条约是联合国药物的公约。然后，在大麻合法化之后，加拿大可以遵守CRC，同时违反第33条明确指的条约的违反条约？本文将参考法案和药物公约的起草调查了这个问题，如何接触到两种系统之间的关系，以及1993 - 2015年儿童权利委员会的实践。虽然CRC可以提供替代框架，通过它来批判性评估药物法律和政策，并通过它的运作，以加强药物管制系统。提出了借助加拿大大麻改革的第33条的解释。根据规定的案文，PACTA TERTIIS规则以及规定的对象和目的，从药物公约的规范性要求中解耦了CRC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号