• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of medical humanities >Introduction: Framing 'Post-AIDS' and Global Health Discourses in 2015 and Beyond
【24h】

Introduction: Framing 'Post-AIDS' and Global Health Discourses in 2015 and Beyond

机译：介绍：2015年及以后的框架“艾滋病效率”和全球健康致命

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This special issue, entitled "Post-AIDS' and Global Health Discourses: Interdisciplinary Perspectives,' emerged from a one day Medical Humanities symposium at the Leeds Centre for Medical Humanities, at the University of Leeds, England, on February 27th 2015. This special issue focusses on the perceived deprioritising of HIV and AIDS in the Sustainable Development Goals, or SDGs, that were launched in 2015. The SDGs function as policy benchmarks for all entities within the United Nations system and they supersede the Millennium Development Goals, or MDGs, which expired in 2015. As the word millennium indicates, the MDGs were launched in 2000 and 2015 was designated as the benchmark year when the successes and shortcomings of the MDGs would be critically assessed. One key difference between the MDGs and the SDGs, which D'Ambruoso foregrounds (2013), is that the writing process underpinning the SDGs involved lengthy consultations, and feedback, with communities and health care practitioners around the world. By contrast, because the MDGs were mainly written by government officials, policy makers and health care practitioners without consulting wider communities, the processes underpinning the SDGs consultations are more inclusive than the MDGs. What is most critical about the SDGs for this special issue, however, is that they reflect a clear shift away from 'HIV exceptionalism' and towards what critics have described as 'post-AIDS' rhetoric, specifically when one compares the MDG health goal 6 and the SDG health goal 3.
机译：这项特别问题，题为“艾滋病效率”和全球卫生话语：跨学科观点，“从2015年2月27日，在英国利兹大学的LEEDS医学人文学科的一天医学人文学科，”跨医学人文专题讨论会。这是特别的关于2015年推出的可持续发展目标的艾滋病毒和艾滋病的艾滋病病毒和艾滋病的歧视和艾滋病的统一性。该SDGS担任联合国系统内所有实体的政策基准，并取代千年发展目标，或千年发展目标，在2015年到期。随着千年这个词的表明，千年发展目标在2000年和2015年推出，被指定为千年发展目标的成功和缺点的基准年份被指定为基准年。千年发展目标与SDGS之间的一个关键差异，d 'Ambruoso前景（2013年）是，写作过程支撑了SDG，涉及漫长的磋商和反馈，社区和医疗保健练习世界各地的人。相比之下，由于千年发展目标主要由政府官员，政策制定者和医疗保健从业者撰写而不咨询更广泛的社区，所以支撑SDGS磋商的流程比千年发展目标更具包容性。然而，关于这个特殊问题的SDG最重要的是，他们反映了远离“艾滋病毒异常主义”的清晰转变，并朝着艾滋病效率的言论被描述为什么，特别是当一个人比较MDG健康目标6时和SDG健康目标3。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号