A comparison between the two methods of chest compression in infant and neonatal resuscitation. A review according to 2010 CPR guidelines

Douvanas Alexandros; Koulouglioti Christina; Kalafati Maria

首页> 外文期刊>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine >A comparison between the two methods of chest compression in infant and neonatal resuscitation. A review according to 2010 CPR guidelines

【24h】

A comparison between the two methods of chest compression in infant and neonatal resuscitation. A review according to 2010 CPR guidelines

机译：婴儿和新生儿复苏两种胸部压缩方法的比较。根据2010年CPR指南审查

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Aim: The quality of chest compression (CC) delivered during neonatal and infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is identified as the most important factor to achieve the increase of survival rate without major neurological deficit to the patients. The objective of the study was to systematically review all the available studies that have compared the two different techniques of hand placement on infants and neonatal resuscitation, from 2010 to 2015 and to highlight which method is more effective.

机译：目的：在新生儿和婴儿心肺复苏期间递送的胸部压缩质量（CPR）被鉴定为实现增长的最重要因素，无需重大神经缺陷给患者。该研究的目的是系统地审查所有可用的研究，这些研究与2010年到2015年的婴儿和新生儿复苏的两种不同的手部展示技巧以及突出哪种方法更加有效。

著录项

来源
《The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine》 |2018年第6期|共12页
作者
Douvanas Alexandros; Koulouglioti Christina; Kalafati Maria;
展开▼
作者单位

Pediat Hosp Athens Infect Control Comm Athens Greece;

Western Sussex Hosp NHS Fdn Trust Res &

Innovat Dept London England;

Univ Athens Fac Nursing Papadiamadopoulou 123 GR-11527 Athens Greece;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类产科学;
关键词
Infant; neonatal resuscitation; chest compression; two-fingers; two-thumbs;

机译：婴儿;新生儿复苏;胸部压缩;双手指;双拇指;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A comparison between the two methods of chest compression in infant and neonatal resuscitation. A review according to 2010 CPR guidelines [J] . Douvanas Alexandros, Koulouglioti Christina, Kalafati Maria The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine . 2018,第1a6期

机译：婴儿和新生儿复苏两种胸部压缩方法的比较。根据2010年CPR指南审查
2. Comparison of chest compression quality between the modified chest compression method with the use of smartphone application and the standardized traditional chest compression method during CPR [J] . ParkS.-S. Technology and health care: official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine . 2014,第3期

机译：心肺复苏术中使用智能手机应用程序的改良胸部按压方法与标准传统胸部按压方法之间的胸部按压质量比较
3. Quality of chest compressions during compression-only CPR: A comparative analysis following the 2005 and 2010 American Heart Association guidelines [J] . The American journal of emergency medicine . 2014,第1期

机译：仅进行按压的心肺复苏期间胸部按压的质量：根据2005年和2010年美国心脏协会指南进行的比较分析
4. Development of a diagnostic glove for unobtrusive measurement of chest compression force and depth during neonatal CPR [C] . Dellimore, Kiran, Heunis, Stephan, Gohier, Francis, Annual Conference of Japanese Society for Medical and Biological Engineering;Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society . 2013

机译：诊断手套的开发，用于在新生儿CPR期间不显眼地测量胸部压力和深度
5. An Analysis of the Research Methods Used in Select Peer-reviewed Law Enforcement Journals, 2010 to 2014 [D] . Lemmon, David L., II 2019

机译：2010至2014年同行评议执法精选期刊研究方法分析
6. Comparison of standard and alternative methods for chest compressions in a single rescuer infant CPR: A prospective simulation study [O] . So Hyun Paek, Do Kyun Kim, Jin Hee Lee, 2019

机译：单个救援人员CPR中胸部压缩标准和替代方法的比较：预期仿真研究
7. A Comparison of Chest Compression Quality According to 2 Rescuers' Teamwork-Oriented Encouragement Method in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation(CPR) Guidelines for 2010 [O] . Sang-Sub Park 2012

机译：根据2救援人员的团队成绩的鼓励方法在2010年心肺复苏（CPR）指南中的胸部压缩质量比较

A comparison between the two methods of chest compression in infant and neonatal resuscitation. A review according to 2010 CPR guidelines

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅