...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine >Sensorial saturation and neonatal pain: a review
【24h】

Sensorial saturation and neonatal pain: a review

机译:感觉饱和度和新生儿疼痛:审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: Sensorial saturation (SS) is an analgesic approach to babies' pain that includes three types of stimulations: oral sugar, massage and caregivers' voice. The aim of this review is to assess its efficacy. Methods: We performed an analysis of scientific literature from 2001 to 2017, retrieving those clinical trials where SS had been compared with other analgesic treatments during procedural pain in babies. Results: We retrieved 14 studies. Pain sources were heel-prick in nine, eye examination and intramuscular shots in two each, and endotracheal aspiration in one. SS was the most effective treatment in all cases, except in endotracheal suctioning. No drawbacks were reported in any study using SS. Conclusion: SS is a safe and effective approach to neonatal pain due to heel-prick, more effective than oral sucrose or glucose in both term and preterm babies; it seems also effective in other types of acute procedural pain like eye examination or intramuscular injections, but more studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data. More studies are also needed to test SS efficacy for other procedures, and for older infants.
机译:目的:情感饱和度(SS)是婴儿疼痛的镇痛方法,包括三种类型的刺激:口腔糖,按摩和护理人员的声音。本综述的目的是评估其疗效。方法:从2001年到2017年对科学文学进行了分析,检测了这些临床试验,其中SS在婴儿的程序疼痛中与其他镇痛治疗进行了比较。结果:我们检索了14项研究。疼痛来源是九次,眼科检查和肌肉内射击的两次,每一个,眼球吸入术。除了气管瘤抽吸外,SS是所有病例中最有效的治疗方法。任何使用SS的研究都没有报告缺点。结论:SS是由于Heel-PRICK,比术语和早产儿的口腔蔗糖或葡萄糖更有效地是一种安全有效的新生儿疼痛的方法;它似乎也有效地在其他类型的急性程序疼痛,如眼科检查或肌肉注射注目,但需要更多的研究来确认这些初步数据。还需要更多的研究来测试其他程序的疗效以及较老的婴儿。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号