首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry >Effect of different resin cements and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of ceramic-glass polymer materials
【24h】

Effect of different resin cements and surface treatments on the shear bond strength of ceramic-glass polymer materials

机译:不同树脂水泥和表面处理对陶瓷 - 玻璃聚合物材料剪切粘合强度的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Statement of problemThe effect of different surface treatment techniques on the bond strength of different types of ceramic-glass polymer computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials and resin cements after aging is unknown. PurposeThe purpose of this in?vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of different ceramic-glass polymer CAD-CAM materials after 2 different surface treatments and the effect of material, surface treatment, resin cement, and aging on bond strength. Additionally, it was to determine any correlation between the surface roughness and bond strength. Material and methodsCAD-CAM ceramic-glass polymer materials, a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) (VITA ENAMIC), a resin nanoceramic (Lava Ultimate), and a nanoparticle-filled resin (Cerasmart) (1.5 mm in thickness; n=144) were divided into 2 subgroups in terms of surface treatments: airborne-particle abraded or silica-coated. The surface roughness values of specimens were measured. Composite resin cylinders were prepared and bonded to the restorative specimens using 2 different types of resin cements (dual-polymerizing [DP] and light-polymerizing [LP]). Half of the specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours, while the other half were submitted to 5000 thermocycles. The shear bond strength was measured, and the failure modes of the specimens were evaluated. The data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α=.05). The correlation between roughness and bond strength values was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. ResultsMaterial (P=.012) and surface treatment type (P=.031) significantly affected the surface roughness. For bond strength, significant interactions were found among the material type, surface treatment, resin cement, and aging factors (P=.009). No significant correlation was found between roughness and bond strength (P=.943). ConclusionsThe surface treatment and resin cement type affected the bond strength and surface roughness of tested restorative materials. DP resin cement provided higher bond strength for airborne-particle abraded nanohybrid composite resin materials. LP resin cement achieved a higher bond strength when used with silica-coated, nanoparticle-filled resin and PICN materials.
机译:问题声明不同表面处理技术对不同类型陶瓷 - 玻璃聚合物计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)材料和树脂水泥的粘接强度的影响未知。其它目的在玻璃体外研究中的目的是评价2种不同的表面处理后不同陶瓷 - 玻璃聚合物CAD-CAM材料的表面粗糙度和材料,表面处理,树脂水泥的效果和老化对粘合强度的影响。另外,它是确定表面粗糙度和粘合强度之间的任何相关性。材料和方法型凸轮陶瓷 - 玻璃聚合物材料,聚合物渗透陶瓷网络(PICN)(VITA稀菊),树脂纳米陶瓷(LAVA终极)和纳米颗粒填充树脂(Cerasmart)(厚度为1.5mm; n =在表面处理方面,144)分为2个亚组:空气粒子磨损或二氧化硅涂覆。测量样品的表面粗糙度值。使用2种不同类型的树脂水泥(双聚合[DP]和光聚合[LP],制备复合树脂圆筒并与恢复试样键合。将一半的标本储存在蒸馏水24小时,而另一半被提交至5000个热型。测量剪切键强度,并评估样品的失效模式。通过ANOVA和Tukey HSD测试分析数据(α= .05)。使用Pearson相关分析分析粗糙度和粘合强度值之间的相关性。结果材料(P = .012)和表面处理型(P = .031)显着影响表面粗糙度。对于粘合强度,材料类型,表面处理,树脂水泥和老化因子中发现了显着的相互作用(P = .009)。粗糙度和粘合强度之间没有发现显着的相关性(P = .943)。结论表面处理和树脂水泥型影响了测试恢复材料的粘合强度和表面粗糙度。 DP树脂水泥为空降粒子磨损的纳米冬冬冬冬冬冬冬胺复合树脂材料提供了更高的粘合强度。当与二氧化硅涂覆的纳米粒子填充的树脂和PICN材料一起使用时,LP树脂水泥达到更高的粘合强度。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者单位

    Department of Prosthodontics Okan University Faculty of Dentistry;

    Department of Prosthodontics Istanbul Aydin University Faculty of Dentistry;

    Division of General Practice and Materials Science The Ohio State University College of Dentistry;

    Division of Restorative Sciences and Prosthodontics The Ohio State University College of Dentistry;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 口腔科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号