...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AIDS care. >Exploring group dynamics for integrating scientific and experiential knowledge in Community Advisory Boards for HIV research.
【24h】

Exploring group dynamics for integrating scientific and experiential knowledge in Community Advisory Boards for HIV research.

机译：探索团体动态，以将科学和经验知识整合到社区顾问委员会中进行HIV研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

To demonstrate how Community Advisory Boards (CABs) can best integrate community perspectives with scientific knowledge and involve community in disseminating HIV knowledge, this paper provides a case study exploring the structure and dynamic process of a "Community Collaborative Board" (CCB). We use the term CCB to emphasize collaboration over advisement. The CCB membership, structure, and dynamics are informed by theory and research. The CCB is affiliated with Columbia University School of Social Work and its original membership included 30 members. CCB was built using six systematized steps meant to engage members in procedural and substantive research roles: (1) engaging membership; (2) developing relationships; (3) exchanging information; (4) negotiation and decision-making; (5) retaining membership; and (6) studying dynamic process. This model requires that all meetings be audio-taped to capture CCB dynamics. Using transcribed meeting data, we have identified group dynamics that help the CCB accomplish its objectives: (1) dialectic process helps exchange of information; (2) mutual support helps members work together despite social and professional differences; and (3) problem solving helps members achieve consensus. These dynamics also help members attain knowledge about HIV treatment and prevention and disseminate HIV-related knowledge. CABs can be purposeful in their use of group dynamics, narrow the knowledge gap between researchers and community partners, prepare members for procedural and substantive research roles, and retain community partners.
机译：为了说明社区顾问委员会（CAB）如何最好地将社区观点与科学知识相结合并使社区参与传播HIV知识，本文提供了一个案例研究，探讨了“社区协作委员会”（CCB）的结构和动态过程。我们使用CCB一词来强调协作而非建议。 CCB的成员资格，结构和动态是通过理论和研究得出的。 CCB隶属于哥伦比亚大学社会工作学院，其原始成员包括30名成员。 CCB是通过六个系统化步骤构建的，旨在使成员参与程序性和实质性研究角色：（1）吸引成员; （2）建立关系; （三）交流信息; （四）谈判决策; （五）保留会员资格; （6）研究动态过程。此模型要求对所有会议进行录音，以捕获CCB动态。使用转录的会议数据，我们确定了有助于CCB实现其目标的群体动力：（1）辩证过程有助于信息交换; （2）互助互助，帮助成员在社会和职业上有所差异而共同努力; （3）解决问题有助于成员达成共识。这些动态还帮助成员获得有关艾滋病毒治疗和预防的知识，并传播与艾滋病毒有关的知识。 CAB可以有目的地利用小组动力，缩小研究人员与社区合作伙伴之间的知识鸿沟，为成员提供程序和实质性研究角色的准备，并保留社区合作伙伴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号