...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of positive psychology >Good for self or good for others? The well-being benefits of kindness in two cultures depend on how the kindness is framed
【24h】

Good for self or good for others? The well-being benefits of kindness in two cultures depend on how the kindness is framed

机译：对别人的自我或有益？ 两种文化中善良的好处取决于善良的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In light of cultural differences in conceptions of happiness, we investigated whether members of independent (vs. interdependent) cultures would benefit from prosocial behavior when self-focus is highlighted (vs. when other-focus is highlighted). In a 1-week randomized controlled intervention, U.S. (N = 280) and South Korean (N = 261) participants were randomly assigned to read a news article that described kind acts as good for oneself or good for others, or to read a control article. All participants then performed kind acts throughout the week, and completed pre- and post- measures of subjective well-being, connectedness, competence, and autonomy. Consistent with independent self-construals, U.S. participants who read that kindness was good for themselves showed greater increases in positive affect, satisfaction with life, and feelings of connectedness - and greater decreases in negative affect - than those who read the control article. Future research is needed to continue developing culturally-sensitive designs of positive activities.
机译：鉴于幸福概念的文化差异，我们调查了独立（与相互依存）文化的成员是否会受益于自我焦点的自我焦点（与其他焦点突出显示）时受益。在一周的随机对照干预中，我们（n = 280）和韩国（n = 261）参与者被随机分配到阅读新闻文章，描述了对自己或对他人的善行或善于善行的新闻文章，或者读取控制文章。然后，所有参与者在整个星期内进行了种类的行为，并完成了主观幸福，关联，能力和自主权的预先和措施。与独立的自我混凝土，美国参与者一致，他们读到这种善良对自己有益的人表现出了更大的影响力，对生命的满意度以及关联的感觉 - 以及负面影响的更大减少 - 而不是那些阅读控制文章的人。未来的研究需要继续开发积极活动的文化敏感设计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号