...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Agricultural History >'What we need is a crop ecologist': ecology and agricultural science in progressive-era America.
【24h】

'What we need is a crop ecologist': ecology and agricultural science in progressive-era America.

机译：“我们需要的是作物生态学家”：美国进步时代的生态学和农业科学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Though they are often seen as foils for each other, ecology and agricultural science co-evolved. With shared roots in late nineteenth-century botany, ecologists and agronomists fostered important connections during the Progressive Era that have been largely overlooked despite a number of finely nuanced studies of ecology's origins. But if "applied ecology" once effectively meant agriculture, over the course of the first decades of the twentieth century the relationship between ecology and scientific agriculture grew strained. Agriculturists narrowed their focus to increasing yields, and ecologists sought to establish their discipline as a distinct theoretical science and so distanced themselves from its agricultural applications. By the end of World War I, the process of disciplinary specialization was well underway. In time the two disciplines diverged so completely that the once vital connections between them were obscured and forgotten.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.3098/ah.2011.85.3.297
机译：尽管它们经常被视为彼此的箔纸，但生态学和农业科学却一起发展。生态学家和农学家们在十九世纪末期的植物学中有着共同的根基，在进步时代中建立了重要的联系，尽管对生态学起源进行了许多细致入微的研究，但这些联系却被很大程度上忽略了。但是，如果“应用生态学”曾经有效地意味着农业，那么在二十世纪的前几十年中，生态学与科学农业之间的关系变得紧张起来。农业学家将注意力集中在增加产量上，生态学家试图将其学科建立为一门独特的理论科学，从而使其脱离农业应用。到第一次世界大战结束时，学科专业化的进程正在顺利进行。随着时间的流逝，这两个学科之间的分歧如此之大，以至于它们之间曾经至关重要的联系被模糊了并被遗忘了。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.3098/ah.2011.85.3.297

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号