• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Value in health: the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research >The Corrective Approach: Policy Implications of Recent Developments in QALY Measurement Based on Prospect Theory
【24h】

The Corrective Approach: Policy Implications of Recent Developments in QALY Measurement Based on Prospect Theory

机译：纠正方法：基于前景理论的凯利测量近期发展的政策影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background and Objectives: Common health state valuation methodology, such as time tradeoff (TTO) and standard gamble (SG), is typically applied under several descriptively invalid assumptions, for example, related to linear quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) or expected utility (EU) theory. Hence, the current use of results from health state valuation exercises may lead to biased QALY weights, which may in turn affect decisions based on economic evaluations using such weights. Methods have been proposed to correct responses for the biases associated with different health state valuation techniques. In this article we outline the relevance of prospect theory (PT), which has become the dominant descriptive alternative to EU, for health state valuations and economic evaluations.
机译：背景和目标：常见的健康状态估值方法，例如时间介绍（TTO）和标准赌博（SG）通常在几个描述无效的假设下应用，例如，与线性质量调整的终身年（QALYS）或预期效用相关 （欧盟）理论。 因此，目前使用来自健康国家估值锻炼的结果可能导致偏见的QALY权重，这可能反过来影响基于使用这种重量的经济评估的决策。 已经提出了对不同健康状态估值技术相关的偏差的响应来校正方法。 在本文中，我们概述了前景理论（PT）的相关性，这已成为欧盟的主导描述性替代品，用于健康状态估值和经济评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号