• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AJOB Primary Research >A Comparison of Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement and Legalized Doping in Sport in a Community Sample of Australian Adults
【24h】

A Comparison of Attitudes Toward Cognitive Enhancement and Legalized Doping in Sport in a Community Sample of Australian Adults

机译：在澳大利亚成年人社区样本中对运动中认知增强和合法使用兴奋剂的态度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: This article compares public attitudes toward the use of prescription drugs for cognitive enhancement with the use of performance enhancing drugs in sport. We explore attitudes toward the acceptability of both practices; the extent to which familiarity with cognitive enhancement is related to its perceived acceptability; and relationships between the acceptability of cognitive enhancement and legalized doping in sport. Methods: A survey was administered through a computer-assisted telephone interviewing system to members of the Australian general public aged 18-101 years in the state of Queensland. Results: Of 1,265 participants, 7% agreed that cognitive enhancement is acceptable; 2.4% of the total sample said they had taken prescription drugs to enhance their concentration or alertness in the absence of a diagnosed disorder, and a further 8% said they knew someone who had done so. These participants were twice as likely to think cognitive enhancement was acceptable. Only 3.6% of participants agreed that people who play professional sport should be allowed to use performance-enhancing drugs if they wanted to. Participants who found cognitive enhancement acceptable were 9.5 times more likely to agree with legalized doping. Conclusions: Policies that facilitated the use of prescription drugs by healthy people for cognitive enhancement or permitted performance-enhancing drugs in sport would be at odds with the attitudes of the vast majority of our participants. Furthermore, our findings do not support media claims that the use of prescription drugs for cognitive enhancement is widespread in all sectors of society.
机译：背景：本文比较了公众对使用处方药促进认知和在运动中使用表现药物的态度。我们探索对两种做法的可接受性的态度;对认知增强的熟悉程度与其感知的可接受性有关;以及认知增强的可接受性与运动中合法使用兴奋剂之间的关系。方法：通过计算机辅助电话访问系统对昆士兰州18-101岁的澳大利亚普通民众进行了调查。结果：在1,265名参与者中，有7％的人认为认知增强是可以接受的;总样本中有2.4％表示他们在没有诊断出疾病的情况下服用了处方药以提高他们的注意力或机敏性，另有8％的样本表示他们认识这样做的人。这些参与者认为认知增强是可以接受的两倍。只有3.6％的参与者同意，从事职业运动的人如果愿意的话，应该允许他们使用提高表现的药物。认为可以接受认知增强的参与者同意合法使用兴奋剂的可能性要高9.5倍。结论：促进健康人使用处方药来增强认知能力或允许在运动中使用表现药物的政策将与绝大多数参与者的态度相矛盾。此外，我们的发现并不支持媒体声称使用处方药来增强认知能力在社会的各个领域都普遍存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号