• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AJOB Primary Research >Factors That Affect Integrity of Authorship of Scientific Meeting Abstracts
【24h】

Factors That Affect Integrity of Authorship of Scientific Meeting Abstracts

机译：影响科学会议论文摘要作者完整性的因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Strict criteria for article authorship exist to guide decisions on who should be considered an author. Less is known about how authorship for scientific meetings is determined. Our goal was to explore factors that influence decisions about authorship of conference abstracts. Methods: In 2010, we conducted qualitative focus groups with a stratified sample of 36 trainees, 19 junior faculty members, and 11 senior faculty members. Focus-group transcripts were coded using a coding scheme derived froman initial review of the transcripts and a preliminary theoretical framework, which was based on the literature, anecdotes, and personal experience. Results: We identified six themes related to abstract authorship: comparisons with articles; collaboration dynamics; time; experience and professional development; standards for authorship; and funding. We found that views of abstracts as a lesser form of publication lead to diminished integrity of authorship; trainee inexperience and the dynamics of collaboration adversely influence the integrity of authorship independently of the perceived difference between an abstract and an article; and early communication about authorship appears to increase the integrity of authorship decisions. Conclusions: Authors do not hold abstracts to the same standard as articles. As such, abstract authorship decisions are frequently inconsistent with authorship criteria pertaining to manuscripts. Such inconsistencies might be improved with stricter institutional rules, clear and consistent authorship guidelines for abstracts submitted to conferences, a requirement that all authors verify their contributions to the abstract, and additional training in the responsible conduct of research.
机译：背景：存在严格的文章作者资格标准，以指导有关应将谁视为作者的决定。人们对如何确定科学会议的作者身份知之甚少。我们的目标是探索影响会议摘要作者决定的因素。方法：2010年，我们进行了定性焦点小组研究，分层抽样了36名受训人员，19名初级教职人员和11名高级教职人员。焦点小组的成绩单是使用一种编码方案进行编码的，该编码方案是基于对成绩单的初步审查和基于文献，轶事和个人经验的初步理论框架得出的。结果：我们确定了与抽象作者有关的六个主题：与文章进行比较;合作动态;时间;经验和专业发展;著作权标准;和资金。我们发现摘要作为出版的次要形式的观点导致作者身份的完整性下降。受训者的经验不足和合作的动力会对作者的完整性产生不利影响，而与摘要和文章之间的差异无关;与作者有关​​的早期交流似乎可以提高作者决定的完整性。结论：作者的摘要与文章的标准不同。这样，抽象著作权的决定常常与有关手稿的著作权标准不一致。可以通过更严格的制度规则，提交给会议的摘要的清晰，一致的作者指南，要求所有作者验证其对摘要的贡献以及在负责任的研究方式中进行额外培训的方式来改善这种不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号