...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Worldviews on evidence-based nursing >Has the Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts in Nursing Improved Since the Release of PRISMA for Abstracts? A Survey of High‐Profile Nursing Journals
【24h】

Has the Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts in Nursing Improved Since the Release of PRISMA for Abstracts? A Survey of High‐Profile Nursing Journals

机译：自从摘要释放以来，在护理中提高了修复的报告质量吗？ 高调护理期刊调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract Background The PRISMA for Abstracts (PRISMA‐A) was developed to guide authors to present a structured abstract. However, the adherence of abstracts to these guidelines in some areas was of concern. Aims To determine whether the publication of PRISMA‐A resulted in an improvement in the abstracts reported with nursing systematic reviews (SRs). Methods This was a cross‐sectional study. We searched PubMed for randomized controlled trials–based SRs published in top‐tier nursing journals. A PRISMA‐A checklist was used to assess abstracts in the SR included. Total score on checklists, comparison of total scores between two periods, and effect factors were analyzed. Results Overall, abstract reporting compliance with PRISMA‐A has not improved significantly with the time span. Of the 81 SRs, 74.1% were structured. About half reported eligibility criteria, information sources, and description of the effect as recommended. Registration status was reported only in 4.9%. The reporting quality was significantly higher for journals with higher impact factors ( p ??.001). Linking Evidence to Action Although not inclusive of all SRs in the nursing field, our sample reflects the general trend that there was no significant improvement in the compliance of SR abstracts reported in nursing with the release of PRISMA‐A. There is room for improvement, as most items have not been fully reported.
机译：抽象背景摘要的prisma（prisma-a）开发了指导作者提出结构化摘要。但是，摘要在某些领域的这些指导方面的遵守是关注的。旨在确定Prisma-A的出版是否导致摘要有所改善，报告的护理系统评论（SRS）。方法这是一个横断面研究。我们在顶层护理期刊上搜索了随机对照试验的基于随机对照试验的SRS。 PRISMA-A检查表用于评估包括的SR中的摘要。分析了检查表的总分，分析了两个时期之间的总分数和效果因子的比较。结果总体而言，随着时间跨度，摘要报告符合Prisma-A的符合性并未显着提高。在81个SRS中，结构化了74.1％。大约有一半的资格标准，信息来源和建议效果的描述。注册状态仅在4.9％中报告。对于具有更高影响因子的期刊（P？001），报告质量显着高。将证据与护理领域的所有SRS联系起来，我们的样本反映了普遍促进普遍释放的SR摘要的遵守情况下没有显着改善。由于大多数物品尚未完全报道，有改进的余地。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号