...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Human movement science >Assessing motor proficiency in young adults: The Bruininks Oseretsky Test-2 Short Form and the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development
【24h】

Assessing motor proficiency in young adults: The Bruininks Oseretsky Test-2 Short Form and the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development

机译：评估青年成人的机动熟练程度：Bruininks Oseretsky Test-2短期和麦克朗的神经肌肉发育评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Highlights ? Low agreement of cases of adult motor impairment between BOT-2 and MAND. ? A single, composite score may be invalid for adult motor assessment. ? Assessment of motor impairment in adulthood requires ecologically valid tasks. Abstract Currently, only two motor tests have norms extending into young adulthood – the McCarron Assessment of Neuromuscular Development (MAND, McCarron 1997) and the Bruininks Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2, Bruininks & Bruininks, 2005). Research into the motor difficulties in early adulthood and health outcomes has been impeded because there is no agreed gold standard motor test for this group. The purposes of this study were to compare the discrimination accuracy, classification agreement, and predictive values, and gender distribution and prevalence of each test in identifying motor impairment (MI) in relation to DSM-V diagnostic criteria for DCD. Ninety-one young, healthy adults (M = 21.4 years, SD = 3.3) were recruited. Those classified as MI by each test scored at one standard deviation or more below the overall mean standard score. Small, statistically significant correlations were found between the MAND and BOT-2 SF tests for score rank (r = 0.370, p = 0.01) and standard score values (r = 0.404; p = 0.01). The overall decision agreement for non-MI cases was relatively high at 85% but very low for MI cases (4.4%). Unexpectedly, gender was balanced in MI cases. BOT-2 SF identified twice as many MI cases than MAND (13.2% vs 6.6%), yet overall comparative test specificity was high (89%). Predictive values for MAND, compared against BOT-2 SF as the standard, indicated broad independence between these tests and overall, the decision statistics indicated that the two tests identified different adult cohorts with MI. Objective classification of adult motor proficiency using a gold standard assessment tool including complex and ecologically valid tasks is still elusive.
机译：强调 ？ BOT-2和MAND之间成人电机损伤案件的低协议。还对于成人电机评估，单个综合评分可能无效。还Adulthood中的电机损伤评估需要生态有效的任务。摘要目前，只有两个电机测试具有延伸到青年的常规 - 麦克朗对神经肌肉发育的麦克朗评估（Mand，McCarron 1997）和电机职能-2（Bot-2，Bruininks＆amp; Bruininks，2005）的Bruininks Oseretsky测试。已经阻碍了成年早期和健康成果的电机困难，因为该组没有商定的黄金标准电机测试。本研究的目的是在与DCD的DSM-V诊断标准相关的情况下，比较每个测试的歧视准确性，分类协议和预测值以及每次测试的性别分布和患病率。招募了九十一位年轻，健康成年人（M = 21.4岁，SD = 3.3）被招募。通过每个测试分类为MI的人在一个标准偏差或更高的总体平均标准得分以下。在CARE等级（R = 0.370，P = 0.01）和标准得分值（r = 0.404; p = 0.01）之间发现小，统计学上发现了统计学的相关性非MI病例的整体决策协议相对较高，但MI案件（4.4％）非常低。出乎意料地，性别在MI案件中平衡。 BOT-2 SF鉴定到MI案例的两倍，而不是MARE（13.2％Vs 6.6％），但总体对比试验特异性高（89％）。法国的预测值，与BOT-2 SF相比，作为标准，表明这些测试之间的独立性和总体而言，决策统计数据表明，两次测试识别了MI的不同成人队列。使用复杂和生态有效任务的黄金标准评估工具的成人电机熟练程度的客观分类仍然难以实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号