...
首页> 外文期刊>Digestive Diseases and Sciences >Screening Women Aged 50-59 for CRC Using Fecal Occult Blood Test Produces Outcomes Similar to Men Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy
【24h】

Screening Women Aged 50-59 for CRC Using Fecal Occult Blood Test Produces Outcomes Similar to Men Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy

机译:使用FECAL隐匿性血液测试的CRC筛查50-59岁的女性产生类似于接受筛查结肠镜检查的男性的结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BackgroundAverage-risk women aged 50-59years have a lower incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer relative to age-matched men, calling into question the benefit of screening colonoscopy in this age group.AimsWe aimed to determine whether FOBT is an effective initial screening test in 50-59-year-old women.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study using a computerized endoscopic report generator. We identified 320,906 individuals who had average-risk screening colonoscopy and 32,369 who had colonoscopy for positive FOBT. The primary outcome was the positive predictive value (PPV) of FOBT for large polyp(s) greater than 9mm, as a surrogate for advanced neoplasia.ResultsAmong patients aged 50-59years undergoing screening colonoscopy, men were more likely than women to have large polyps (6.3 vs 4.2%, p0.0001). Black women undergoing screening colonoscopy had higher rates of large polyps compared to non-Black women. The PPV in FOBT-positive men aged 50-54 (11.5%) and 55-59 (14.4%) was higher than in women aged 50-54 (6.1%) and 55-59 (5.4%). Despite this lower PPV, women aged 50-54 with a positive FOBT had a similar rate of large polyps as 50-54-year-old men undergoing screening colonoscopy (6.1 vs 6.3%, p=0.626).ConclusionsCRC screening with FOBT identifies 50-59-year-old men and women with a higher risk of large polyps. Since younger women have a lower risk of large polyps than men, screening with FOBT in 50-59-year-old non-Black women could be an effective screening strategy, with outcomes similar to the use of screening colonoscopy in 50-59-year-old men.
机译:Backgryoudaverage-Visual女性相对于年龄匹配的男性患有结肠直肠癌的发病率和死亡率较低,呼吁质疑在这个年龄组中筛查结肠镜检查的益处。旨在确定FOBT是一种有效的初始筛查测试吗? 50-59岁女性。近期使用计算机内窥镜报告发生器进行了横断面研究。我们确定了320,906个患有平均风险的筛选结肠镜检查,32,369人患有阳性FOBT的结肠镜检查。主要结果是用于大于9mm的大息肉的阳性预测值(PPV),作为晚期肿瘤的替代品。50-59岁患者进行筛查的结肠镜检查,男性比女性更有可能有大息肉(6.3 Vs 4.2%,P <0.0001)。与非黑人女性相比,接受筛选结肠镜检查的黑人女性具有更高的大息肉率。 FOBT阳性男性50-54岁(11.5%)和55-59(14.4%)的PPV高于50-54岁(6.1%)和55-59(5.4%)。尽管PPV较低,50-54岁的女性患有阳性FOBT的大息肉率与50-54岁男性筛选的筛选结肠镜检查(6.1 VS 6.3%,P = 0.626)。ConclusionsCrc筛选用FOBT识别50 -59岁的男性和患有较高息肉风险的男性和女性。由于年龄较小的女性具有比男性的大息肉的风险较低,因此在50-59岁的非黑人女性中筛选FOBT可能是一个有效的筛查策略,结果类似于50-59岁的筛选结肠镜检查 - 男人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号