...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of advanced nursing >Language consistency: a missing link in theory, research and reasoning?
【24h】

Language consistency: a missing link in theory, research and reasoning?

机译：语言一致性：理论，研究和推理的缺失链接？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Language consistency: a missing link in theory, research and reasoning? Aim. This paper is a report of a study conducted to determine if there is a lack of language consistency in nursing texts and among nursing educators related to theory, research and reasoning. Background. Analysis of international language, communication and nursing literature revealed the essential role language consistency plays in promoting competency and desirable behavioural outcomes. It also revealed the difficulty nursing has had in gaining consistency of language associated with theory, research and reasoning. Method. Six nursing theory, research and terminology texts with international circulation were analysed to identify key words related to theory, research and reasoning and to determine consistency of definitions among texts. Next, 97 nursing educators were surveyed to determine their ability to define the same key words. Educators were recruited during three national nursing education meetings in the United States of America between 2006 and 2007. Findings. Analysis revealed significant variability in definitions of key words among texts and in nursing educators' ability to match any defining words used by the texts and by each other. Conclusion. Epistemologically, the use of inconsistent language among texts and educators may be playing a role in the continuing marginalization of theory, research and reasoning in nursing education and practice; ultimately, hindering the profession's epistemological growth. Recommendations include a call for consensus of key words and meanings associated with theory, research and reasoning and the development of a language essentials document to support development of competency.
机译：语言一致性：理论，研究和推理的缺失链接？目的。本文是一份关于研究的研究报告，以确定是否存在护理文本中的语言一致性以及与理论，研究和推理有关的护理教育者。背景。国际语言，沟通和护理文学分析揭示了促进能力和理想行为结果方面的基本职业语言一致性。它还揭示了难度护理在获得与理论，研究和推理相关的语言的一致性。方法。分析了六种护理理论，具有国际流通的研究和术语文本，以确定与理论，研究和推理有关的关键词，并确定文本中定义的一致性。接下来，调查了97名护理教育者以确定他们定义相同关键词的能力。 2006年至2007年期间在美国三个国家护理教育会议期间招募了教育工作者。调查结果。分析揭示了文本中关键词的定义和护理教育者匹配文本和彼此使用的任何定义单词的能力的显着变化。结论。在博学上讲，文本和教育工作者之间的使用不一致的语言可能在持续边缘化的理论，研究和推理中的持续边缘化中的作用;最终，妨碍了职业的认识论生长。建议包括呼吁与与理论，研究和推理相关的关键词和含义共识，以及向支持能力发展的语言要素文件的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号