...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Psychology >The Structure of Group Task Performance-A Second Look at 'Collective Intelligence': Comment on Woolley et al. (2010)
【24h】

The Structure of Group Task Performance-A Second Look at 'Collective Intelligence': Comment on Woolley et al. (2010)

机译：组任务表现的结构 - 第二个看“集体智能”：关于Woolley等人的评论。 （2010）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Collective intelligence has been described as a general factor that "explains a group's performance on a wide variety of tasks" (Woolley, Chabris, Pentland, Hashmi, & Malone, 2010, p. 686), much like the general intelligence factor explains individuals' performance on cognitive ability tasks. This construct has received widespread attention in both the media and academic community. In this article we reexamine the data from 6 previously published samples that have been used to examine the existence of the collective intelligence construct and show that the empirical support for the construct is generally weak. Specifically, we show that the general factor explains only little variance in the performance on many group tasks. We also highlight how 2 statistical artifacts-the apparent presence of low effort responding and the nested nature of the data-may also have inflated the little covariation that exists between group performance on different tasks. These findings suggest that there is insufficient support for the existence of a collective intelligence construct.
机译：集体智能被描述为“解释了集团在各种任务上的表现”（Woolley，Chabris，Pentland，Hashmi，Malone，2010，第686页）的一般因素，就像一般情报因素解释个人“认知能力任务的性能。该构建体在媒体和学术界都受到了广泛的关注。在本文中，我们重新审视了6个以前公布的样本的数据，这些样本已被用于检查集体智能构造的存在，并表明构建体的实证支持通常很弱。具体来说，我们表明一般因素仅解释了许多组任务的性能的几乎不差异。我们还突出了2个统计伪影 - 低努力响应的明显存在和数据的嵌套性质 - 也可能夸大了不同任务的组性能之间存在的小重新变焦。这些调查结果表明，对集体智能构造的存在不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号