...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies >The prone bridge test: Performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults
【24h】

The prone bridge test: Performance, validity, and reliability among older and younger adults

机译：易于桥梁测试：年龄和较年轻的成年人的性能，有效性和可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

IntroductionThe prone bridge maneuver, or plank, has been viewed as a potential alternative to curl-ups for assessing trunk muscle performance. The purpose of this study was to assess prone bridge test performance, validity, and reliability among younger and older adults. MethodSixty younger (20-35 years old) and 60 older (60-79 years old) participants completed this study. Groups were evenly divided by sex. Participants completed surveys regarding physical activity and abdominal exercise participation. Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were measured. On two occasions, 5–9 days apart, participants held a prone bridge until volitional exhaustion or until repeated technique failure. Validity was examined using data from the first session: convergent validity by calculating correlations between survey responses, anthropometrics, and prone bridge time, known groups validity by using an ANOVA comparing bridge times of younger and older adults and of men and women. Test-retest reliability was examined by using a pairedt-test to compare prone bridge times for Session1 and Session 2. Furthermore, an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to characterize relative reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC95%) was used to describe absolute reliability. ResultsThe mean prone bridge time was 145.3?±?71.5?s, and was positively correlated with physical activity participation (p?≤?0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI and waist circumference (p?≤?0.003). Younger participants had significantly longer plank times than older participants (p?=?0.003). The ICC between testing sessions was 0.915. ConclusionThe prone bridge test is a valid and reliable measure for evaluating abdominal performance in both younger and older adults.
机译：介绍易于桥式机动或板条，已被视为抑制用于评估躯干肌肉性能的潜在替代品。本研究的目的是评估年轻人和老年人的易患桥梁测试性能，有效性和可靠性。 Methodsixty年轻人（20-35岁）和60名年龄较大（60-79岁）参与者完成了这项研究。群体均匀地除以性别。参与者完成了关于身体活动和腹部运动参与的调查。测量高度，重量，体重指数（BMI）和腰围。在两次，分开5-9天，参与者持有俯卧桥，直到意志耗尽或直到重复的技术失败。通过第一届会议的数据检查有效性：通过使用Anova比较年轻人和年龄较大的成年人和男性和女性的Anova来计算调查响应，人体测量学和俯卧桥时间，已知群体有效性的收敛有效性。通过使用Fairedt-Test进行检查，以比较Session1和会话2的俯卧桥时间来检查测试 - 重保持可靠性。此外，使用脑内相关系数（ICC）来表征相对可靠性，并且使用最小的可检测变化（MDC95％）来描述绝对可靠性。结果易于桥梁时间为145.3？±71.5？s，与物理活性参与呈正相关（P？≤≤001），与BMI和腰围呈负相关（P？≤≤003）。年轻的参与者比老年参与者显着更长，比老年人（P？= 0.003）。测试会话之间的ICC为0.915。结论易于桥梁测试是评估年轻人和老年人腹部性能的有效且可靠的措施。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Richard W. Bohannon; Michal Steffl; Susan S. Glenney; Michelle Green; Leah Cashwell; Kveta Prajerova; Jennifer Bunn;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Physical Therapy College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Campbell University;

    Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University;

    Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Department of Kinesiology School of Agriculture and Health;

    Department of Physical Therapy College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Campbell University;

    Department of Physical Therapy College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Campbell University;

    Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Charles University;

    Department of Physical Therapy College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Campbell University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 运动医学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号