首页> 外文期刊>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies >Is there a difference in response to manual cranial bone tissue assessment techniques between participants with cervical and/or temporomandibular complaints versus a control group?
【24h】

Is there a difference in response to manual cranial bone tissue assessment techniques between participants with cervical and/or temporomandibular complaints versus a control group?

机译:响应宫颈和/或颞下颌抱怨与对照组的参与者之间的手动颅骨组织评估技术有差异是否存在差异?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: Manual cranial bone tissue techniques (CBTT) are used by physiotherapists as a tool for assessment and treatment of complaints in the craniocervical, face, and head regions. The goal of this study was to determine whether CBTT were able to discriminate between subjects with cervical and/or temporomandibular disorders (TMD) and a healthy group. In addition, the inter-rater reliability when applying CBTT was also investigated.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted and included 60 participants. Six standardized passive techniques were applied and judged for resistance, compliance, and sensory answer. In order to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of these techniques a cohort of participants was measured twice (by two evaluators) prospectively. A logistic regression model and Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analyses were used to determining the discriminative validity of these techniques.
机译:目的:手动颅骨组织技术(CBTT)由物理治疗师使用作为评估和治疗颅脑,脸部和头部区域的投诉的工具。 本研究的目标是确定CBTT是否能够区分宫颈和/或颞下颌疾病(TMD)和健康组的受试者。 此外,还研究了申请CBTT时的帧间性可靠性。方法:进行横截面研究并包括60名参与者。 应用六种标准化的被动技术,并判断抵抗,遵守和感官答案。 为了评估这些技术的帧间间可靠性,将参与者队列预期测量两次(两次评估员)。 Logistic回归模型和接收器操作曲线(ROC)分析用于确定这些技术的辨别有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号