...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology >Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test
【24h】

Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test

机译：并非所有性能有效性测试都是平等的：回忆和熟悉在记忆恶意和词内存测试的测试中的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Word Memory Test R (WMT) are both performance validity tests (PVTs) that use a two-alternative forced- fi choice (2AFC) recognition memory format. Several studies have reported that these tests are susceptible to cognitive impairment and that the WMT is more susceptible F than the TOMM. The current study explored components of recognition memory (i.e., p conscious recollection and familiarity) underlying the TOMM and WMT to identify p factors that make them susceptible and resilient to cognitive impairment. Method: p Fifty-four nonclinical undergraduate research participants were administered the T TOMM and WMT while providing introspective judgments about their recognition memory using the remember/know/guess procedure. In addition, half of participants were administered dual-task interference, a manipulation intended to reduce recollection, during these tests, while the other half completed these tests without interference. Standard cutoffs on the TOMM and WMT were explored, as well as alternative cutoffs based on TOMM Trial 1 scores. Results: The WMT was more impacted by dual-task interference than standard TOMM cutoff trials, while alternative TOMM cutoff trials were equally impacted by dual-task interference relative to the WMT. Dual-task interference reduced recollection on these tests, but spared familiarity. Standard TOMM trials and the WMT were relatively comparable on levels of recollection, but familiarity contributed more to the TOMM than to the WMT. Alternative TOMM trials possessed lower familiarity and recollection than standard TOMM trials and lower recollection than the WMT. Conclusions: Reduced recollection places examinees at risk of failing the TOMM and WMT, while familiarity contributes to the relative resilience of the standard TOMM. Future development of 2AFC recognition memory PVTs should attempt to maximize the contribution of familiarity to their completion.
机译：内存恶意（TOMM）和Word Memory Test R（WMT）的测试是使用双替代强制选择（2AFC）识别存储器格式的性能有效性测试（PVT）。若干研究报告说，这些测试易受认知障碍的影响，并且WMT比Tomm更容易受到影响。目前的研究探讨了Tomm和WMT的识别记忆（即，P意识的回忆和熟悉程度）的组成部分，以识别使其易感和适应认知障碍的P因子。方法：第五十四次非临床本科研究员进行TOMM和WMT，同时使用记忆/知道/猜测程序提供关于其识别记忆的内省判断。此外，一半的参与者进行了双重任务干扰，旨在减少回忆的操纵，在这些测试期间，而另一半在没有干扰的情况下完成这些测试。探索了TMM和WMT的标准截止，以及基于TOMM试验的替代截止值。结果：WMT由双任务干扰影响而不是标准TOMM截止试验，而替代TOMM截止试验同样受到WMT的双任务干扰的同样影响。双任务干扰减少了对这些测试的回忆，而是令人熟悉的。标准TMM试验和WMT在回忆水平上相对可比，但熟悉程度促使TOMM多于WMT。替代的Tomm试验比标准TMM试验和比WMT较低的令人熟悉和倒退较低。结论：减少的回忆置于失败Tomm和WMT的风险中的考生，而熟悉程度有助于标准TOMM的相对弹性。 2AFC识别记忆PVT的未来发展应该试图最大限度地提高熟悉贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号