...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology >A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias
【24h】

A two-step manuscript submission process can reduce publication bias

机译：两步稿件提交过程可以减少出版物偏差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Much of what is researched is never published. This would not be of great concern if the selection of what we read would occur irrespective of study outcomes. Unfortunately, the reverse is the case: "positive" studies have a much larger chance of acceptance after editorial and peer review than "negative" ones. Several solutions to this problem of publication bias have been discussed or implemented, but none seem to be very effective. In this article, the approach of implementing an editorial and peer-review procedure that is blinded to study outcomes is discussed. This would require a two-step submission procedure of manuscripts: first a version including just the introduction and methods and in some cases followed by a second submission including results and discussion. The pros and cons of such an approach are discussed.
机译：从未发表过大部分研究。 如果选择我们读取的情况，那么如果出现的研究结果，这将不会有很大的关注。 不幸的是，逆转就是如此：“积极的”研究在编辑和同行评审之后的接受程度大于“消极”。 已经讨论或实施了几个出版物问题的解决方案，但没有似乎非常有效。 在本文中，讨论了实施蒙蔽以研究结果的编辑和同行评审程序的方法。 这将需要手稿的两步提交程序：首先是一个版本，包括介绍和方法以及在某些情况下，然后是第二次提交，包括结果和讨论。 讨论了这种方法的利弊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号