...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of consulting and clinical psychology >Can Working Memory Training Work for ADHD? Development of Central Executive Training and Comparison With Behavioral Parent Training
【24h】

Can Working Memory Training Work for ADHD? Development of Central Executive Training and Comparison With Behavioral Parent Training

机译：可以为ADHD工作记忆培训工作吗？ 发展中央执行培训和与行为父母培训的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Objective: Working memory deficits have been linked experimentally and developmentally with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related symptoms/impairments. Unfortunately, substantial evidence indicates that extant working memory training programs fail to improve these symptoms/impairments. We hypothesized that this discrepancy may reflect insufficient targeting, such that extant protocols do not adequately engage the specific working memory components linked with the disorder's behavioral/functional impairments. Method: The current study describes the development, empirical basis, and initial testing of central executive training (CET) relative to gold-standard behavioral parent training (BPT). Children with ADHD ages 8-13 (M = 10.43, SD = 1.59; 21 girls; 76% Caucasian/non-Hispanic) were treated using BPT (n = 27) or CET (n = 27). Detailed data analytic plans for the pre/post design were preregistered. Primary outcomes included phonological and visuospatial working memory, and secondary outcomes included actigraphy during working memory testing and two distal far-transfer tasks. Multiple feasibility/acceptability measures were included. Results: The BPT and CET samples did not differ on any pretreatment characteristics. CET was rated as highly acceptable by children and was equivalent to BPT in terms of feasibility/acceptability as evidenced by parent-reported high satisfaction, low barriers to participation, and large ADHD symptom reductions. CET was superior to BPT for improving working memory (Group x Time d = 1.06) as hypothesized. CET was also superior to BPT for reducing actigraph-measured hyperactivity during visuospatial working memory testing and both distal far-transfer tasks (Group x Time d = 0.74). Conclusions: Results provide strong support for continued testing of CET and, if replicated, would support recent hypotheses that next-generation ADHD cognitive training protocols may overcome current limitations via improved targeting.
机译：目的：工作记忆缺陷已经通过实验和发育，注意力缺陷/多动障碍（ADHD） - 相关症状/损伤。不幸的是，实质性证据表明，现存的工作记忆培训计划未能改善这些症状/损伤。我们假设这种差异可能反映目标不足，使得现时协议不会充分接合与疾病的行为/功能损伤相关的具体工作存储器组件。方法：目前的研究描述了相对于金标准行为父母培训（BPT）的中央执行培训（CET）的开发，实证和初步测试。患有ADHD 8-13岁的儿童（M = 10.43，SD = 1.59; 21个女孩;使用BPT（n = 27）或CET（n = 27）对待76％白种人/非西班牙裔。预先记录了预/后设计的详细数据分析计划。主要结果包括语音和探索工作记忆，二次结果包括工作记忆测试期间的戏法和两个远端传输任务。包括多种可行性/可接受性措施。结果：BPT和CET样品对任何预处理特征没有差异。 CET被儿童的高度可接受的评为，并且在可行性/可接受性方面相当于BPT，通过父母报告的高度满意度，低障碍和大的ADHD症状减少而证明。 CET优于BPT，用于改善工作记忆（Group X时间D = 1.06）作为假设。 CET还优于BPT，用于减少粘面空间工作记忆测试期间的AITIGAPH测量的多动症，并且远端远传输任务（组X时间D = 0.74）。结论：结果为CET的持续测试提供了强有力的支持，如果复制，将支持最近的假设，即下一代ADHD认知培训协议可能通过改进的目标来克服当前限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号