• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Is the Utility of Secondary Coping a Function of Ethnicity or the Context of Reception? A Longitudinal Study Across Western and Eastern Cultures
【24h】

Is the Utility of Secondary Coping a Function of Ethnicity or the Context of Reception? A Longitudinal Study Across Western and Eastern Cultures

机译：是次要应对民族的效用或接待的背景吗？ 西部和东方文化的纵向研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although cross-cultural research suggests that the development and functionality of secondary coping strategies are substantially influenced by the broader cultural context, research findings are not completely conclusive. Some studies indicate that secondary coping is more adaptive for Asian participants compared with Westerners, while others emphasize the adaptability of the coping style in Asian, but not Western, contexts. The main objective of the present study was to systematically test for ethnic and contextual differences in the effectiveness of secondary strategies (measured in the form of acceptance and positive reinterpretation) in reducing the negative effects of acculturative stress on somatic symptoms with samples of international students. A 3-month longitudinal study was conducted in two different contexts: (a) Asian and Western international students in China (Asians: n = 53, Westerners: n = 51) and (b) similar groups in New Zealand (Asians: n = 61, Westerners: n = 65). The data were subjected to a hierarchical regression analysis with changes in psychological symptoms functioning as the dependent variable. Findings indicated that stress, secondary coping, and cultural context significantly interacted in predicting changes in somatic symptoms. Specifically, secondary coping exacerbated the negative effects of acculturative stress on psychological adjustment in New Zealand. In contrast, secondary coping functioned as a buffer in China, such that it was effective at reducing the negative impact of stress over time. Findings indicated that ethnicity did not significantly moderate the stress-coping-adjustment relationship. Our results show that the effectiveness of secondary coping varies as a function of the cultural context.
机译：虽然跨文化研究表明，二次应对策略的发展和功能受到更广泛的文化背景的影响，但研究结果并不完全决定。一些研究表明，与西方人相比，亚洲参与者的二级应对更适应，而其他人则强调在亚洲，但不是西方语境中的应对方式的适应性。本研究的主要目的是系统地测试次要策略的有效性（以验收和正回收的形式测量的差异差异，从而降低了缩减症状与国际学生样本的含量胁迫的负面影响。在两个不同的背景下进行了3个月的纵向研究：（a）中国亚洲和西方国际学生（亚洲人：n = 53，西方人：n = 51）和（b）在新西兰的类似群体（亚洲人：n = 61，西方人：n = 65）。数据进行了分层回归分析，该分析分析与作为从属变量的心理症状的变化进行了变化。结果表明，在预测体细胞症状的变化方面，显着互动的压力，二次应对和文化背景。具体而言，继发性应对加剧了缩减对新西兰心理调整的负面影响。相比之下，二次应对作为中国的缓冲器，使得它有效降低压力随时间的负面影响。调查结果表明，种族没有显着缓解应激调整关系。我们的研究结果表明，作为文化背景的函数，二次应对的有效性变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号