• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cross-cultural psychology >Natural Disaster Risk and Collectivism
【24h】

Natural Disaster Risk and Collectivism

机译：自然灾害风险和集体主义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Previous research found that low levels of national wealth and high levels of historical pathogen prevalence are associated with collectivism. The main idea is that harsh economic and physical environments present a psychological threat, which evokes collectivism or the priority of protecting in-group members. To the extent that natural disasters pose a major threat, we hypothesized that natural disaster risk is also associated with collectivism. Consistent with our hypothesis, nations with higher levels of natural disaster risk were more collectivistic than those with lower risk using both Hofstede's individualism-collectivism scores and Taras, Steel, and Kirkman's meta-analytic individualism-collectivism scores from 1970 to 2010, and Taras et al.'s meta-analytic individualism-collectivism scores from the 2000s. This association remained significant when controlling for other climatic factors such as historical pathogen prevalence, climatic harshness, and distance from the equator, respectively, when Hofstede's individualism-collectivism scores and Taras et al.'s scores from 1970 to 2010 were used. The association became marginal when Taras et al.'s scores from the 2000s were used. A multiple regression analysis showed that natural disaster risk was not a predictor of collectivism, above and beyond gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, pathogen prevalence, climatic harshness, and distance from the equator simultaneously. Finally, we found the interaction between GDP per capita and natural disaster such that the link between natural disaster risk and collectivism was present among wealthy but not among poorer nations.
机译：以前的研究发现，低水平的国家财富和高水平的历史病原体患病率与集体主义有关。主要思想是，严酷的经济和物理环境呈现出心理威胁，这引起了集体主义或保护群体成员的优先事项。在自然灾害构成重大威胁的范围内，我们假设自然灾害风险也与集体主义有关。与我们的假设一致，具有较高水平的自然灾害风险的国家比使用Hofstede的个人信息 - 集体主义分数和塔拉斯，钢铁和柯克曼的荟萃分析个人主义 - 集体集中主义分数从1970年到2010年的风险较低，而Taras et al。从2000年代的荟萃分析个人主义 - 集体主义分数。当Hofstede的个人主义 - 集体主义分数和Taras等人分别控制诸如历史病原体患病率当塔拉斯等人时，协会变得边缘。使用了2000年代的分数。多元回归分析表明，自然灾害风险不是集体主义的预测因素，以上和超出国内生产总值（GDP），病原体患病率，气候萎缩和与赤道同时的距离。最后，我们发现了人均GDP与自然灾害之间的互动，使自然灾害风险和集体主义之间的联系存在于富人之外但不较贫困的国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号