...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of community & applied social psychology >Leave or remain? European identification, legitimacy of European integration, and political attitudes towards the EU
【24h】

Leave or remain? European identification, legitimacy of European integration, and political attitudes towards the EU

机译：离开或留下？ 欧洲识别，欧洲一体化的合法性，以及对欧盟的政治态度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this paper, we look at the relationship between European identification and political support for (or opposition to) EU membership. First, we argue that conceptualizing political attitudes towards the EU as a direct product of European identification (a) neglects the distinction between the social reality of Europe and the political reality of the EU and (b) leads to psychological reductionism. We propose that the relationship should instead be conceptualized as mediated by legitimacy perceptions and as moderated by social-level variables. Second, we look at three spheres of European integration and propose that their perceived legitimacy is appraised through the following principles: (a) normative solidarity for wealth sharing, (b) political authority for sharing political decisions, and (c) collective self-realization for the sharing of practices. We illustrate the key mediating role of those principles by drawing on data from a survey ran across five European countries. Third, we argue that these meditational relationships are in turn moderated by social, political, and ideological realities and illustrate this point by looking at the case of United Kingdom in the context of the EU membership referendum. We point to an ideological assumption in the U.K. political landscape about the illegitimacy of EU supranational decision making and argue that this contributed to shape both the debate of the referendum campaign and its result.
机译：在本文中，我们看看欧洲识别与政治支持（或反对）欧盟成员资格之间的关系。首先，我们认为将欧盟的政治态度概念化为欧洲识别的直接产品（a）忽视了欧洲社会现实与欧盟和（b）的政治现实之间的区别导致心理还原能力。我们建议这种关系应该被概念化，如通过合法性感知的介导，并且由社会级别变量主持。其次，我们看看欧洲一体化的三个领域，并提出他们的感知合法性通过以下原则评估：（a）财富分享规范团结，（b）分享政治决定的政治权力，（c）集体自我实现分享实践。我们通过绘制来自五个欧洲国家的调查横跨的数据来说明这些原则的关键调解角色。第三，我们认为这些冥想关系又受到社会，政治和思想现实的主持，并通过在欧盟成员公投中观察英国的情况来说明这一点。我们指出了U.思想的思想假设。关于欧盟的非法决策的政治景观，并争辩说，这有助于塑造公民投票活动的辩论及其结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号