...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of dentistry >Outcome of restorative treatment in young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. A cross-sectional, retrospective study
【24h】

Outcome of restorative treatment in young patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. A cross-sectional, retrospective study

机译:患有Amelogesis患者患者的恢复性治疗结果。 横断面,回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives The longevity of dental restorations in patients with amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is limited. The aim of this paper is to compare oral health and longevity of dental restorations in a group of young patients with AI compared to a control group.Methods Patients included were 82 patients with AI, 40 boys and 42 girls, 6 to 25 years old (mean age 14.5 ± 4.3 years) and a control group matched in age, gender and residential area. All patients received an examination recording dental caries, gingivitis, previous therapy, replaced restorations, tooth sensitivity, and number of dental visits. Patient dental records, extending from 6 to 10 years before the study, provided data on previous care.Results Annual mean number of dental visits in the AI group was 2.9 ± 1.7 compared to 1.9 ± 1.2 in the control group (p < 0.001). DMFS was 8.1 ± 15.6 in the AI group compared to 1.0 ± 2.0 in the control group (p < 0.001). The longevity of dental restorations was significantly lower in the patients with AI, with 24.7 ± 35.1% of the AI group requiring replacement of fillings during the observation period compared to 9.23 ± 23.7% in the control group (p = 0.001). Patients with hypomineralized/hypomaturized AI have restorations of shorter longevity than those with hypoplastic AI (p < 0.01). Porcelain crowns had significantly longer survival than composite resin materials in the AI group (p < 0.001).Clinical significance This study shows the need for long-lasting restorative solutions for patients with AI. It also shows the importance of establishing an early permanent therapy plan for these patients to avoid frequent dental visits.
机译:目的是患者患者牙齿修复患者的寿命有限。本文的目的是与对照组相比,将一组年轻患者的牙科修复剂的口腔健康和寿命与对照组相比。患者包括82名AI,40名男孩和42名女孩,6至25岁(平均14.5±4.3岁)和在年龄,性别和住宅区匹配的对照组。所有患者均接受检验记录龋齿,牙龈炎,先前治疗,更换修复,牙齿敏感性和牙科景点。患者牙科记录,从研究前6到10年延伸,提供了先前护理的数据。对照组中,AI组的年度平均牙科次数的牙科次数为2.9±1.2(P <0.001)。在AI组中,DMF在AI组中为8.1±15.6,而对照组1.0±2.0相比(P <0.001)。 AI患者的牙齿修复患者的寿命显着降低,24.7±35.1%的AI组,需要在观察期间更换填充物,而对照组的9.23±23.7%(P = 0.001)。患有副骨髓/低聚菌的AI患者的寿命较短而比含有Hypoplastic AI的患者(P <0.01)。瓷冠的存活率明显多于AI组中的复合树脂材料(P <0.001)。本研究表明,该研究表明,需要对AI患者进行长期恢复溶液的需求。它还显示了为这些患者建立早期永久治疗计划的重要性,以避免频繁的牙科访问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号