...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Planning and Management >Public participation and appeal rights in decision-making on wind energy infrastructure: a comparative analysis of the Danish and English legal framework
【24h】

Public participation and appeal rights in decision-making on wind energy infrastructure: a comparative analysis of the Danish and English legal framework

机译：关于风能基础设施决策的公众参与和上诉权利：丹麦和英语法律框架的比较分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article is concerned with public participation and its linkages with appeal rights in planning decisions for major onshore wind farms in England and Denmark. We are particularly interested in how the legal framework shapes the scope of participation and appeals and, more specifically, whether a third party right to appeal (TPRA) has a participatory potential beyond the initial decision-making process. Despite structural differences, our analysis shows that in both countries the legal frameworks limit the participatory potential of administrative appeals, either through a restricted third party access to appeal mechanisms or through a restricted scope of review in appeals. Even where access is unrestricted, TPRA can hardly constitute an extension of participation, unless the scope for review is equally extended. Thus, reliance on TPRA as a participatory tool would require changes to the legal framework in both jurisdictions.
机译：本文涉及公众参与及其在英格兰和丹麦主要陆上风电场的决定中的上诉权利。 我们对法律框架如何塑造参与和上诉的范围，更具体地说，申诉（TPRA）是否具有超出初始决策过程的参与潜力的人。 尽管结构差异，但我们的分析表明，在两国，法律框架都会限制行政上诉的参与性潜力，无论是通过限制的第三方获取上诉机制还是通过限制在上诉范围内的审查范围。 即使访问不受限制，除非审查范围同样延长，否则TPRA几乎无法构成参与的延长。 因此，对TPRA作为参与式工具的依赖需要改变两个司法管辖区的法律框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号