...
首页> 外文期刊>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders >Validation of the Cuban Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment
【24h】

Validation of the Cuban Version of Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment

机译:验证Addenbroke的认知检查修订的古巴版用于筛选轻度认知障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background/Aims: The diagnostic accuracy of the Cuban version of the revised Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (ACE-R) in identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was assessed. Methods: The Cuban ACE-R was administered to a group of 129 elderly subjects (92 cognitively healthy and 37 subjects with MCI). The t tests for independent samples were used to compare scores of different psychometric scales between groups, and effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated. Cronbach's coefficient a was used to evaluate the reliability of psychometric scales. The validity of ACE-R to screen for MCI was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: The Cuban ACE-R had reliable internal consistency (Cronbach's coefficient alpha = 0. 879). The optimal cut-off score for ACE-R for detecting MCI was 84/85. The sensitivity and specificity of ACE-R to screen for MCI was superior to those of MMSE. The area under the ROC curve of the Cuban ACE-R was much larger than that of MMSE (0.93 and 0.63) for detecting MCI. Conclusion: The Cuban ACE-R is a valid screening tool for detecting cognitive impairment. It is more sensitive and accurate in screening for MCI than MMSE. (c) 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景/宗旨:评估了与迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)相比识别温和认知障碍(MCI)的修正addEnbroke的认知检查(ACE-R)的古巴版的诊断准确性。方法:将古巴ACE-R施用至129名老年人(92人认知健康和37名受试者)。独立样品的T测试用于比较组之间的不同心理尺度的分数,并计算效果大小(COHEN的D)。 Cronbach的系数A用于评估心理尺度的可靠性。通过接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线评估ACE-R对MCI屏幕的有效性。结果:古巴ACE-R具有可靠的内部一致性(Cronbach系数alpha = 0.879)。用于检测MCI的ACE-R的最佳截止分数为84/85。 MCI筛选的ACE-R的敏感性和特异性优于MMSE。古巴ACE-R的ROC曲线下的区域远大于MMSE(0.93和0.63)的曲线,用于检测MCI。结论:古巴ACE-R是一种用于检测认知障碍的有效筛选工具。在MCI筛选比MMSE更敏感和准确。 (c)2018年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号