• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Explaining Purportedly Irrational Behavior by Modeling Skepticism in Task Parameters: An Example Examining Confidence in Forced-Choice Tasks
【24h】

Explaining Purportedly Irrational Behavior by Modeling Skepticism in Task Parameters: An Example Examining Confidence in Forced-Choice Tasks

机译：通过在任务参数中建模怀疑主义来解释据说是据称的不合理行为：一个示例检查强制选择任务的信心

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many purported demonstrations of irrational behavior rely on the assumption that participants believe key task parameters that are merely asserted by experimenters. For example, previous researchers have found that participants who first reported confidence in items presented in a yes–no format did not change confidence to the degree prescribed by the normative model when those same items were later presented in a forced-choice format. A crucial assumption, however, was that participants fully believed the assertion that the forced-choice items were mutually exclusive and exhaustive. In this article, the authors derive and test a new normative model in which it is not assumed that participants fully believe the assertion. Two visual identification experiments show that the new normative model provides a compelling account of participants' confidence reports.
机译：许多声称的非理性行为的演示依赖于参与者认为关键任务参数的假设，这些参数仅被实验者所称。 例如，以前的研究人员发现，首次报告以yes-no的格式提供的物品信心的参与者对规范模型的规定的程度没有变得更改，当时稍后以强制选择格式呈现。 然而，至关重要的假设是，参与者充分认为强制选择项目互斥和详尽令人遗憾的断言。 在本文中，作者派生并测试了一种新的规范模型，其中没有假设参与者完全相信断言。 两个视觉识别实验表明，新的规范模式提供了参与者信心报告的令人信服的叙述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号