• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forestry >Regulation and Practice of Forest-Management Fires on Private Lands in the Southeast United States: Legal Open Burns versus Certified Prescribed Burns
【24h】

Regulation and Practice of Forest-Management Fires on Private Lands in the Southeast United States: Legal Open Burns versus Certified Prescribed Burns

机译：森林 - 管理在美国私人土地上的规定与实践美国：法律公开烧伤与认证规定的烧伤

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Forest-management burns have been widely acknowledged as a useful land-management tool in the United States. Nevertheless, fire is inherently risky and may lead to severe damages or create smoke that affects public health. Past research has not explored the difference in policy and practice between open burns, which meet minimum legal criteria, and certified prescribed burns, which follow a higher standard of care. This study seeks to understand the distinction between legal open burns and certified prescribed burns, and, furthermore, to identify trends by type of burn in the Southeast United States. To that end, we compared statutes, regulations, incentives, and notifications of fire as a forest-management tool among nine states in the US Southeast. We found no steady time trends in number or area of burns among the states for the past decade. A nontrivial proportion of legal open burns, which tend to be smaller burns, are noncertified burns, meaning they meet minimum legal requirements, but not the higher standard required for certified prescribed burns.
机译：森林管理烧伤被广泛被视为美国有用的土地管理工具。尽管如此，火灾本质上有风险，可能导致严重损害或产生影响公共卫生的烟雾。过去的研究尚未探索开放烧伤之间的政策和实践差异，符合最低法律标准，并进行认证的规定烧伤，遵循更高的护理标准。本研究旨在了解法律开放燃烧和认证规定的烧伤之间的区别，而且，在美国东南部的烧伤类型识别趋势。为此，我们将大约，法规，激励措施和火灾通知与美国东南部的九个州之间的森林管理工具进行了比较。我们在过去十年中发现了州之间的数量或燃烧的数量或区域没有稳定的时间趋势。非法公开烧伤的非活动比例趋于较小的烧伤，是非烧伤的，这意味着它们符合最低的法律要求，而不是认证规定烧伤所需的更高标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号