...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Medical Entomology >Evaluation of Novel Trapping Lures for Monitoring Exotic and Native Container-Inhabiting Aedes spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes
【24h】

Evaluation of Novel Trapping Lures for Monitoring Exotic and Native Container-Inhabiting Aedes spp. (Diptera: Culicidae) Mosquitoes

机译：评价新型诱饵诱饵，用于监测异国情调和天然容器居住AEDES SPP的诱饵。 （Diptera：Culicidae）蚊子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Surveillance for diurnal container-inhabiting mosquitoes such as Aedes albopictus (Skuse), Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald), and Aedes triseriatus (Say) have routinely relied on the deployment of multiple trap types, including CO2-baited light traps, gravid traps, oviposition traps, and BG-Sentinel. These trap configurations have met with varying degrees of effectiveness and in many instances likely under-sample these key mosquito vectors. Most recently, the BG-Sentinel trap used in conjunction with the human-scent lure has been largely accepted as the gold-standard for monitoring Ae. albopictus. However, its ability to attract other container-inhabiting Aedes species has not been fully evaluated. During 2018, we tested new scent lures, TrapTech Lure-A and Lure-H (Bedoukian Research, Inc.), using BG-Sentinel traps with CO2 in two regions of Connecticut, Stamford and Hamden, against the BG-Lure. Pooled mosquitoes were additionally screened for arbovirus infection. A total of 47,734 mosquitoes representing 8 genera and 32 species were captured during the study, with the Stamford site deriving on average three times as many mosquitoes per trap, adjusting for sampling effort. Lure-A and Lure-H outperformed the BG-Lure in terms of total numbers, diversity evenness, and the proportion of both Ae. j. japonicus and Ae. triseriatus. There were no significant differences among lures in capturing Ae. albopictus, and in terms of species richness. Fifty-seven isolates of virus (West Nile, Jamestown Canyon, and La Crosse viruses) were obtained during the study, with no significant difference between trap-lure. We highlight both novel lures as effective attractants for use in mosquito surveillance=, which either outperform, or equal, BG-Lure.
机译：户外蚊子般的蚊子（Skuse），Aedes japonicus（theobald）和aleesstrisiatus（例如）的监视，常规依赖于多个陷阱类型的部署，包括CO2-诱捕的光陷阱，妊娠陷阱，产卵陷阱，和bg-sentinel。这些陷阱配置已经满足不同程度的有效性，并且在许多可能在这些关键的蚊子载体下的许多情况下。最近，与人类气味诱饵结合使用的BG-Sentinel陷阱已经很大程度上被认为是监测AE的金标准。 Albopictus。但是，它尚未得到完全评估吸引其他容器栖息的AEDES物种的能力。 2018年，我们测试了新的香水诱饵，Treptech Lure-A和Lure-H（Bedoukian Research，Inc。），在康涅狄格州康涅狄格州的两个地区使用BG-Sentinel陷阱，斯坦福德和哈姆登的二十家反对BG-Lure。另外筛选汇集蚊子以进行腹腔血管感染。在研究期间捕获了总共47,734个蚊子和32种物种，斯坦福特网站平均每次陷阱的蚊子等三倍，调整采样努力。 Lure-A和Lure-H在总数，多样性均匀度和AE的比例方面表现出BG诱饵。 j。 japonicus和ae。 Triseriatus。在捕获AE中的诱饵中没有显着差异。 Albopictus，以及物种丰富性。在研究期间获得了五十七分离株病毒（西尼罗河，詹姆斯敦峡谷和La Crosse病毒），陷阱诱饵之间没有显着差异。我们突出了两种新诱饵作为有效的吸引剂，用于蚊子监控=，其优于或等于BG-Lure。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号