...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of personality and social psychology >Measuring Moral Politics: How Strict and Nurturant Family Values Explain Individual Differences in Conservatism, Liberalism, and the Political Middle
【24h】

Measuring Moral Politics: How Strict and Nurturant Family Values Explain Individual Differences in Conservatism, Liberalism, and the Political Middle

机译：衡量道德政治：严格和养育家庭价值观如何解释保守主义，自由主义和政治中间的个人差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Individuals' political stances tend to place them into the conservative "right," the liberal "left," or the moderate "middle." What might explain this pattern of division? Moral Politics Theory (Lakoff, 1996) holds that political attitudes arise from moral worldviews that are conceptually anchored in contrasting family models-the strict-father and nurturant-parent models-while the political middle is morally "biconceptual," endorsing both models simultaneously. The present research examined these postulations empirically. Studies 1 and 2 tested the conceptual and predictive validity of the theorized models by developing an instrument assessing strict and nurturant parenting beliefs (the Moral Politics Scale [MPT]), and examining its power to predict political stances on issues seemingly unrelated to parenting attitudes (e.g., abortion, taxes, and same-sex marriage). Studies 3a and 3b explored construct validity while testing whether the family models translate into more general moral worldviews, which then serve as a foundation of political attitudes. Studies 4a through 4c tested generalizability, examining the relationship between the family models and political stances across different countries, data-collection modalities, and a representative American sample. Finally, Studies 5-7 explored biconceptualism and the tendency for these individuals to shift political attitudes as a consequence of situational factors, particularly moral framing, such that strict-father frames lead to increased support for conservative stances while nurturant-parent frames lead to increased support for liberal stances. Overall, we found support for each of MPT's assertions, suggesting that an important aspect of the conceptual and experiential basis of people's political attitudes lies in the strict-father and nurturant-parent family models.
机译：个人的政治立场倾向于将它们放入保守派“权利”中，“左”或中间的“中间”。什么可能解释这种分裂模式？道德政治理论（Lakoff，1996）认为，在截然造影的家庭模式 - 严格的父亲和养育模型中，概念性地锚定的政治态度 - 虽然政治中间在道德上，但同时认可两种模型。本研究凭经验检查了这些姿势。研究1和2通过开发评估严格和养育者育儿信仰的仪器（道德政治规模[MPT]）的仪器测试了理论化模型的概念和预测有效性，并审查其权力预测与育儿态度无关的问题上的政治立场（例如，堕胎，税收和同性婚姻）。研究3A和3B探讨了建设有效性，同时测试家庭模式是否转化为更普通的道德世界观，然后作为政治态度的基础。研究4A到4C测试的概括性，检查不同国家，数据收集方式和代表性的美国样本之间的家庭模式和政治立场之间的关系。最后，研究5-7探讨了Biconeptualim，以及这些个人因情境因素而改变政治态度的趋势，特别是道德框架，使严格的父亲框架导致保守阶段的支持增加，而Nurturant-Mater框架导致增加支持自由阶段。总体而言，我们找到了对MPT的每个断言的支持，这表明人们政治态度的概念和体验基础的一个重要方面在于严格的父亲和养育家族家庭模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号