• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP >Putting the Law Into Practice: A Comparison of Isolation and Quarantine As Tools to Control Tuberculosis and Ebola
【24h】

Putting the Law Into Practice: A Comparison of Isolation and Quarantine As Tools to Control Tuberculosis and Ebola

机译：将法律实施到实践中：将分离和检疫作为控制结核病和埃博拉的工具的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The recent Ebola epidemic has put the words "isolation and quarantine" in the spotlight. Isolation and quarantine are tools that are often utilized by public health officials around the United States to address various types of infectious disease, including tuberculosis. While voluntary compliance is preferred, it can be difficult to achieve. In cases where an individual chooses not to voluntarily comply with an isolation or quarantine request, public health officials require assistance from the judiciary and law enforcement to effectuate the order. This article compares 2 recent court cases with different outcomes where public health officials sought assistance from the courts to enforce an isolation or quarantine order.
机译：最近的埃博拉流行病在聚光灯下将“隔离和隔离”的单词“。 隔离和隔离物是美国周围的公共卫生官员常用的工具，以解决各种类型的传染病，包括结核病。 虽然是自愿的合规性是首选，但可能难以实现。 在个人选择不自愿遵守孤立或检疫要求的情况下，公共卫生官员需要司法机构和执法援助来实现订单。 本文将最近的2个法院案件与公共卫生官员寻求从法院寻求孤立或检疫订单的不同成果进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号