• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Risk, Environment and Modernity Towards a New Ecology
【24h】

Risk, Environment and Modernity Towards a New Ecology

机译：风险，环境和现代性对新生态学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This book reproduces the discussion at an international symposium held in Lancaster in 1992 to critically examine the work of the German sociologist Ulrich Beck and the British social theorist Anthony Giddens on modernity, risk and the culture of environmental issues. A recent essay by Beck opens the collection, and we will emphasize it in this critical book review; Giddens' ideas we must divine from brief hints and short, dense summaries scattered through the collection. Beck afgues that an older industrial society is replaced by an emergent 'risk society'. Hazards produced by industrial society increasingly elude control by its institutions. At first, self-endangerment is not the subject of poltical conflict. But increasingly the institutions of industrial society both produce and legitimate (through 'criticism') hazards they cannot control: society sees and criticizes itself as risk society. Beck refers to this as a process of 'reflexive modernization', reflexive not in the sense of critical reflection, but as self-confrontation with consequences emerging/from an unintentional transition from industrial to risk society that cannot be addressed.
机译：本书在1992年在兰卡斯特举行的国际研讨会上讨论，批判性地审查德国社会学家Ulrich Beck和英国社会理论家安东尼关于现代性，风险和环境问题文化的工作。贝克最近的一篇文章打开了该系列，我们将在这篇关键的书籍审查中强调它; Giddens的想法，我们必须从简短的暗示和短暂的，密集的摘要散落在集合中。贝克阿夫图认为，较老的工业社会被新兴的“风险社会”所取代。工业社会产生的危害越来越多地由其机构控制。起初，自我危害不是派系冲突的主题。但越来越多的工业社会机构都产生和合法（通过“批评”）他们无法控制的危害：社会认为并批评自己是风险社会。 Beck是指这是一个“反思现代化”的过程，反思不是在临界反映的意义上，而是作为自我对抗，这种后果出现/来自工业风险社会的无意过渡无法解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号