• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >'They are treating us with contempt': The complexities of opposition in an English village
【24h】

'They are treating us with contempt': The complexities of opposition in an English village

机译：“他们正在蔑视我们”：英国村庄反对的复杂性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article is an ethnographic examination of the response to proposed housing development in an English village which provides broader insights into the nature of democratic and decision-making processes around local development projects. Dissecting the complexities of class, age and length of residence, it argues that attributions of either 'NIMBYism' or 'community cohesion' simplify how and why people come together. Charges of NIMBYism in popular representation seek to exploit difference through certain well-established tropes. These often distinguish between the interests of poorer and longer-established residents with livelihoods rooted in rural areas, and those of wealthier people with urban-based livelihoods for whom rural housing is a lifestyle choice. Academic discussions of NIMBYism have sought to unpack the complexity of opposition, identifying problems in the uncritical use of the term. In contributing to this literature, I argue that it is important to consider how responses are shaped by both a combination of individual interest and sense of investment in place. I suggest that 'community' is an effective organising device for protesters that can obscure numerous differences and that the nature of political process and consultation also are crucial factors in shaping opposition. Concerns with the nature of nominally democratic processes and the role of outsider imposition are especially significant here.
机译：本文是对英国村内拟议住房发展的答复的民族划分审查，为民主和决策过程周围的民主和决策过程中的性质提供了更广泛的见解。解剖阶级，年龄和居住长度的复杂性，它争辩说，“Nimbyism”或“社区凝聚力”的归属简化了人们如何以及为何聚集在一起。流行代表中的小幼豆指控寻求通过一定良好的Tropers利用差异。这些往往区分贫穷和更长的居民的利益，植计生物植物生计，以及富裕人民与城市的生计，农村住房是一种生活方式选择。 Nimbyism的学术讨论试图解开反对派的复杂性，确定了术语不加批判用的问题。在促进这个文献方面，我认为，重要的是要考虑如何通过个人兴趣和投资感的组合来塑造反应。我建议，“社区”是一个有效的组织设备，用于抗议者，可以模糊多种差异，政治进程和咨询的性质也是塑造反对派的重要因素。关注名义上民主进程的性质和局外征收的作用在这里特别重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号