首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Development Economics >Comparing the welfare costs and initial dynamics of alternative inflation stabilization policies
【24h】

Comparing the welfare costs and initial dynamics of alternative inflation stabilization policies

机译:比较替代通货膨胀稳定政策的福利成本和初始动态

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper uses calibrated versions of a sticky-price currency-substitution model to compare the initial dynamics and welfare costs of three types of stabilization program: exchange-rate-based (ERB), money-based (MB), and money-based with initial reliquefication (MBR). ERB and MBR programs are found to induce an initial expansion in real activity, whereas MB programs are initially contractionary. The welfare gains of eliminating high inflation are significant under permanent ERB and MBR programs but small under permanent MB programs. In addition, temporary MB programs are shown to be much more disruptive than temporary ERB or MBR programs. These results provide an explanation for why MB programs are so rarely implemented and suggest that empirical studies that fail to distinguish MB from MBR programs are likely to be biased toward finding that stabilizations are always expansionary regardless of the nominal anchor.
机译:本文采用校准版本的粘性货币替代模型,比较三种稳定计划的初始动态和福利成本:基于汇率(ERB),基于金钱(MB)和基于金钱的 初始释放(MBR)。 发现ERB和MBR程序在实际活动中诱导初始扩展,而MB程序则最初是愈点的。 消除高通胀的福利收益在永久ERB和MBR计划下,但在永久性MB计划下小幅。 此外,临时MB程序显示比临时ERB或MBR程序更具破坏性。 这些结果对为什么MB程序很少实施,并表明未能区分MB程序的经验研究可能偏向于发现稳定性始终是扩张性,而不管标称锚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号