首页> 外文期刊>American journal of rhinology >Analysis of methods to assess frontal sinus extent in osteoplastic flap surgery: transillumination versus 6-ft Caldwell versus image guidance.
【24h】

Analysis of methods to assess frontal sinus extent in osteoplastic flap surgery: transillumination versus 6-ft Caldwell versus image guidance.

机译:骨成形皮瓣手术中评估额窦程度的方法分析:透照与6英尺考德威尔与图像引导。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare three common methods (transillumination, plain radiographs, and computerized tomography [CT] image guidance) for estimating the position and extent of pneumatization of the frontal sinus in osteoplastic flap surgery. METHODS: Axial CT scans and 6-ft Caldwell radiographs were performed on 10 cadaver heads. For each head, soft tissue overlying the frontal bone was raised and the anticipated position and extent of the frontal sinus at four points was marked using three common methods. The silhouette of the frontal sinus from the Caldwell plain radiograph was excised and placed in position. Four points at the periphery also were made using information obtained from a passive optically guided image-guided surgery device, and transillumination via a frontal trephination also was used to estimate sinus extent. The true sinus size was measured at each point and compared with experimental values. RESULTS: The use of CT image guidance generated the least difference between measured and actual values (mean = 1.91 mm; SEM = 0.29); this method was found statistically superior to Caldwell (p = 0.040) and transillumination (p = 0.007). Image guidance did not overestimate the size of the sinus (0/36) and was quicker than the Caldwell approach (8.5 versus 11.5 minutes). There was no learning curve appreciated with image guidance. CONCLUSION: Accurate and precise estimation of the position and extent of the frontal sinus is crucial when performing osteoplastic flap surgery. Use of CT image guidance was statistically superior to Caldwell and transillumination methods and proved to be safe, reproducible, economic, and easy to learn.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是比较三种常见的方法(透照,X线平片和计算机断层扫描[CT]图像指导),以估计在整形皮瓣手术中额窦气化的位置和程度。方法:对10具尸体头部进行了轴向CT扫描和6英尺考德威尔射线照相。对于每个头,抬高覆盖额骨的软组织,并使用三种常见方法标记额窦在四个点的预期位置和范围。切除Caldwell平原X射线照片中额窦的轮廓并将其放置在适当的位置。还使用从被动式光学引导图像引导手术设备获得的信息在外围进行四点测量,并且还使用通过额叶环透术的透射照明来评估窦性程度。在每个点上测量真实的鼻窦大小并将其与实验值进行比较。结果:使用CT图像引导产生的测量值与实际值之间的差异最小(平均值= 1.91 mm; SEM = 0.29);该方法在统计学上优于考德威尔(p = 0.040)和透照法(p = 0.007)。图像引导并没有高估鼻窦的大小(0/36),并且比考德威尔方法(8.5分钟对11.5分钟)要快。在图像指导下没有欣赏曲线。结论:进行骨成形皮瓣手术时,准确,准确地估计额窦的位置和范围至关重要。在统计学上,CT图像引导的使用优于Caldwell和透照法,并且被证明是安全,可重现,经济且易于学习的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号