• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Comparing intubation performance of indirect laryngoscopes: Study design is crucial
【24h】

Comparing intubation performance of indirect laryngoscopes: Study design is crucial

机译：比较间接喉镜的插管性能：研究设计至关重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Tampo et al.'s study [1] comparing performance of the Pentax Airway Scope~(TM) and the Airtraq~(TM) for tra-cheal intubation in an infant manikin, with and without chest compression, found that the times to view the glottis and intubate the trachea intubation were significantly shorter when using the Airway Scope than when using the Airtraq. The authors suggested that the Airway Scope can provide continuous observation of the airway structures from the moment the device is inserted into the mouth, whereas the Airtraq requires a practitioner to look into the eyepiece for a glottic view, and this is only possible at the middle to late phases of insertion. We suggest that two limitations in study design may have made interpretation of their findings questionable.
机译：Tampo等人的研究[1]比较了Pentax Airway ScopeTM和AirtraqTM在有或没有胸部按压的情况下对婴儿人体模型进行气管插管的性能，发现需要观察的时间使用气道镜时，声门和气管插管明显短于使用Airtraq时。作者建议，气道镜可以从设备插入口中开始就可以连续观察气道结构，而Airtraq则需要医生从目镜中观察声门，这只能在中间进行。到插入的后期。我们建议研究设计中的两个局限性可能使对他们的发现的解释令人怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号