首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Complications associated with peripheral or central routes for central venous cannulation.
【24h】

Complications associated with peripheral or central routes for central venous cannulation.

机译:与中心静脉插管的外围或中心路径相关的并发症。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We undertook a review of studies comparing complications of centrally or peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Twelve studies were included. Catheter tip malpositioning (9.3% vs 3.4%, p = 0.0007), thrombophlebitis (78 vs 7.5 per 10,000 indwelling days, p = 0.0001) and catheter dysfunction (78 vs 14 per 10,000 indwelling days, p = 0.04) were more common with peripherally inserted catheters than with central catheter placement, respectively. There was no difference in infection rates. We found that the risks of tip malpositioning, thrombophlebitis and catheter dysfunction favour clinical use of centrally placed catheters instead of peripherally inserted central catheters, and that the two catheter types do not differ with respect to catheter-related infection rates.
机译:我们进行了一项研究的比较,该研究比较了中央或外周插入的中央静脉导管的并发症。包括十二项研究。导管末梢错位(9.3%vs 3.4%,p = 0.0007),血栓性静脉炎(78 vs 7.5 / 10,000住院天,p = 0.0001)和导管功能障碍(78 vs 14 / 10,000住院天,p = 0.04)插入的导管要比中心导管放置的要多。感染率没有差异。我们发现,尖端错位,血栓性静脉炎和导管功能障碍的风险有利于临床使用中央放置的导管,而不是周边插入的中央导管,并且两种导管类型在与导管相关的感染率方面没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号