• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care nursing quarterly >Early Versus Traditional Oral Feeding Following Elective Colorectal Surgery A Literature Review
【24h】

Early Versus Traditional Oral Feeding Following Elective Colorectal Surgery A Literature Review

机译：早期与传统口腔喂养后选修结直肠手术进行了文献综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Traditional feeding protocols withhold oral intake until the return of bowel function for concern of postoperative complications following elective colorectal surgery. Implementation of early feeding into clinical practice challenges this conventional approach. The purpose of this literature review is to analyze the current evidence and compare the impact of traditional versus early oral feeding protocols on postoperative outcomes following elective colorectal resection. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Scopus was conducted. Outcomes of interest include the resolution of postoperative ileus, the incidence of anastomotic leakage, and length of hospital stay. Patients assigned to early oral feeding began oral caloric intake within 24 hours of surgery, whereas oral intake was withheld until the resolution of postoperative ileus for patients in the traditional oral feeding group. Five trials met the inclusion criteria for this review. All studies reported on the primary outcomes of interest. A P value less than .05 was considered significant. Results indicate that early oral feeding following elective colorectal surgery did not extend the duration of postoperative ileus as evidenced by shorter time to first flatus and defecation, did not increase the incidence of anastomotic leakage, and demonstrated shorter length of hospital stay when compared with traditional management.
机译：None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号