• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AACE International Transactions >Retrospective TIAs - Is There a Better Way?
【24h】

Retrospective TIAs - Is There a Better Way?

机译：回顾性蒂亚斯 - 有没有更好的方法？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The power of Time Impact Analysis (TIA) methodology is attested to by its near universal adoption as a preferred method to establish entitlement for time extensions during the course of a project using CPM scheduling. The AACE RP 52R-06 (2006), which provides a detailed explanation of how to properly perform this prospective analysis, is further example of Prospective TIA's importance. Yet, at the same time, Retrospective TIAs continue to pose significant methodological issues even though it remains a major methodology for determining the delays in a CPM schedule, as reflected in the AACE RP29R-03 (2011). Questions concerning retrospective TIA's accuracy abound as originally reflected in the question posed in the 2008 AACE presentation on the matter: "Retrospective TIAs - Time to Lay Them to Rest?" After nearly four decades of use, this article presents a case as to why the use of forensic TIAs should be sharply restricted due to its defects and the alternatives that are available to the expert analyst.
机译：None

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号