...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore >Comparison of Chinese medicine education and training in China and Australia.
【24h】

Comparison of Chinese medicine education and training in China and Australia.

机译：中澳两国中医教育培训比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The similarities and differences between Chinese medicine (CM) education in China and Australia are considered in a detailed comparison of the five-year undergraduate programmes offered by the Beijing University of CM (BUCM), China and RMIT University (RMIT), Australia. BUCM is a specialist CM institution whereas RMIT is a technological university providing training in a wide range of professional areas. Both institutions are considered to be leading tertiary institutions within their respective countries. A brief account of the historical development of CM education in China and Australia is provided. We have compared the curricula and structure of the programmes and how they each address the development of essential graduate capabilities for competent and safe clinical CM practice. We have also considered the quality assurance processes and the requirements of external regulatory authorities. The curricula and educational objectives of the 2 programmes are broadly similar. Both institutions have established rigorous processes for managing teaching quality and ensuring appropriate graduates to promote evidence-based CM practice. However, there are differences relating to the healthcare systems of China and Australia and to the availability of teaching resources and clinical training facilities such as classical CM texts and CM hospitals. These differences present major challenges for the internationalisation of CM education. The findings of this study may facilitate the process of CM curriculum development in a global context.
机译：在对中国北京医学大学（BUCM）和澳大利亚皇家墨尔本理工大学（RMIT）提供的五年制本科课程的详细比较中，考虑了中国和澳大利亚中医（CM）教育之间的异同。 BUCM是专业CM机构，而RMIT是一所技术大学，提供广泛的专业领域培训。两家机构均被视为各自国家/地区的领先大专院校。简要介绍了中国和澳大利亚的CM教育的历史发展。我们比较了课程的课程结构和结构，以及它们各自如何解决胜任的重要研究生能力的发展，以确保他们能够胜任安全的临床CM实践。我们还考虑了质量保证流程和外部监管机构的要求。这两个课程的课程和教育目标大致相似。两家机构都建立了严格的流程，以管理教学质量并确保合适的毕业生促进循证医学的实践。但是，在中国和澳大利亚的医疗保健系统以及教学资源和临床培训设施（例如经典CM文本和CM医院）的可用性方面存在差异。这些差异为CM教育的国际化提出了重大挑战。这项研究的结果可能会促进在全球范围内进行CM课程开发的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号