...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>ANZ journal of surgery >Medicine in small doses Why not hire a ghost writer to write your next manuscript?
【24h】

Medicine in small doses Why not hire a ghost writer to write your next manuscript?

机译：小剂量药物为什么不雇用幽灵作家来撰写下一份手稿？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Not such a bad idea! Indeed not that uncommon in high-impact medical journals, as disclosed by Wislar et al. (BMJ 2011; 343: d6128). They found in a cross-sectional survey of journal articles from 2008 that 21% of authors used either an honorary writer (17%), a ghost writer (7.9%) or both.A ghost writer can be defined as a professional writer who is paid to write books, articles, reports or other text that are officially referred to another person (http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Ghostwriter). An honorary writer is similar but is unpaid.Medical ghost writers fulfil a much needed gap in assisting the researcher who does not write well and is too busy, to produce a manuscript with greater efficiency and discipline, and with a little practice, the ghost writer can mimic the researcher's style, sense and use of language, (http://www.medicalwriter.com.au), so one can see how this concept is very appealing to medical practitioners who are trained to operate and do research, rather than write! However, as tempting as it may be, Baskin and Gross {BMJ 2011; 343: d6223) call for greater transparency and disclosure in authorship of the subsequent medical research papers. Criteria for authorship as defined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (http://www.icmje.org) include; substantial contributions to concept and design; acquisition analysis and interpretation of data; and help in drafting and revising the manuscript and the final approval of the version of publication. The concerns of Baskin and Gross are that these criteria do not go far enough and that the author bi-line may not have accurate information on the individual contributions. They refer to the editors of Neurology (http://www.neurology.org) who have extended the criteria to include that any paid medical writer who wrote the first draft or responded to the reviewer's comments must be included in the author bi-lines.
机译：这不是一个坏主意！实际上，正如Wislar等人所披露的那样，在高影响力的医学期刊中并不少见。 （BMJ 2011; 343：d6128）。他们在2008年对期刊文章进行的横断面调查中发现，有21％的作者使用名誉作家（17％），幽灵作家（7.9％）或两者兼有。幽灵作家可以定义为专业作家支付撰写正式转给他人的书籍，文章，报告或其他文本的费用（http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Ghostwriter）。名誉作家与此类似，但没有报酬。医学幽灵作家在帮助写作不佳且太忙的研究人员以更高的效率和纪律性，稍加实践后便可以帮助他们撰写手稿方面存在巨大的差距。可以模仿研究人员的语言风格，感觉和使用方式（http://www.medicalwriter.com.au），因此，可以看到这一概念对于受过训练，能够进行操作和进行研究的医生的吸引力，而不是对他们的吸引力写！然而，巴斯金和格罗斯（BMJ 2011; 343：d6223）要求增加透明性，并在随后的医学研究论文中公开披露。国际医学期刊编辑委员会（http://www.icmje.org）定义的作者标准包括;对概念和设计的重大贡献;采集分析和数据解释;并帮助起草和修改稿件以及最终批准出版物版本。 Baskin和Gross担心的是，这些标准还远远不够，作者的双线可能没有关于个人贡献的准确信息。他们指的是神经病学（http://www.neurology.org）的编辑者，他们扩大了标准，使其包括撰写第一稿或对审阅者的评论作出回应的任何有偿医学作家都必须包含在作者的双行中。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号