• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Psychology Public Policy and Law >Perceptions of Police Brutality: Does Audio Matter?
【24h】

Perceptions of Police Brutality: Does Audio Matter?

机译：对警察暴行的看法：音频很重要吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research investigated whether the perceived level of force (categorized as justifiable force, moderate force, or excessive force) used by a law enforcement officer in effecting an arrest or detention changes depending on whether the audio track was present or removed from the arrest video. Participants were each shown 5 arrest videos with either the audio feed intact or removed. Participants were asked to indicate whether they felt the use of force depicted in the video was justified, moderate, or excessive. There was a significant association between audio presence or absence for 3 of 5 use of force videos. For 2 of 3 arrest videos with significant associations, participants perceived the violence as less severe when the audio track was removed. For the remaining video, removal of the audio track increased the percentage of participants who found the use of force to be excessive. The current data suggest that by removing the audio feed from arrest videos, the justifiability of use of force incidents can be manipulated. These data are an indication of the malleability of perceptions and judgments, and they serve to motivate future research in this area as we seek to understand, and thus tackle, the issue of police use of force incidents.
机译：这项研究调查了执法人员在实施逮捕或拘留方面使用的武力水平（被归类为合理的力量，中等力量或过度武力）是否取决于是否存在音轨或从逮捕视频中删除。参与者分别显示了5个逮捕视频，其音频馈送完整或删除。要求参与者指出他们是否认为视频中描绘的力是合理，中等或过度的使用。 5使用力视频中的3个使用音频存在或不存在之间存在显着关联。对于有重大关联的3个逮捕视频中的2个，参与者认为，当删除音轨时，暴力行为不那么严重。对于剩余的视频，删除音轨增加了发现使用力量过高的参与者的百分比。当前的数据表明，通过从逮捕视频中删除音频提要，可以操纵使用武力事件的合理性。这些数据表明了观念和判断的锻造性，并且在我们寻求理解并因此解决警察使用武力事件的问题时，它们有助于激励该领域的未来研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号