• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water >Defining “water resilience”: Debates, concepts, approaches, and gaps
【24h】

Defining “water resilience”: Debates, concepts, approaches, and gaps

机译：定义“水弹性”：辩论，概念，方法和差距

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Resilience is increasingly applied the context of water systems, and water governance more broadly, in response to climate change impacts, hydrologic variability and uncertainty associated with various dimensions of global environmental change. However, the meanings, applications and implications of resilience as it relates to water governance are still poorly understood. Drawing on a systematic scoping review of the peer‐reviewed academic literature, this paper addresses the questions: how is resilience framed in relation to water systems and water governance, how are diverse resilience framings (re)shaping ideas and trends in water management, and what are the associated implications? The analysis found that the resilience‐informed water governance literature remains fragmented and predominantly centered on conventional approaches and framings of water planning, with a predominant focus on engineering resilience in water supply infrastructure. A recently emerging engagement with resilience in the water governance literature, however, draws on more diverse framings and theories and calls for a shift towards more integrative and ecologically‐centered thinking in water governance. Despite this, significant empirical and conceptual gaps remain, particularly around the integration of the various subsectors of water governance and, more importantly, around the institutional and governance dimensions of building water resilience.
机译：越来越多地利用了供水系统的背景，并且对气候变化的影响，水文变异性和与全球环境变化的各个方面相关的不确定性的响应越来越广泛。但是，与水治理有关的弹性的含义，应用和含义仍然很少了解。借鉴了对同行评审的学术文献进行系统的范围审查，本文解决了以下问题：如何与水系统和水治理有关，如何构成多样化的弹性框架（重新）塑造水管理的思想和趋势，以及相关的含义是什么？分析发现，具有弹性的水治理文献仍然分散，主要集中于常规方法和水计划的框架，主要关注供水基础设施中的工程弹性。然而，最近在水治理文献中与韧性的新兴参与借鉴了更多样化的框架和理论，并呼吁转向水治理中更融合和以生态为基础的思想。尽管如此，仍然存在重大的经验和概念差距，尤其是围绕着水治理的各个分区的整合，更重要的是，围绕建筑水弹性的制度和治理维度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号