• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Property, Planning and Environmental Law >Regeneration of brownfield land: the environmental law challenges
【24h】

Regeneration of brownfield land: the environmental law challenges

机译：布朗菲尔德土地的再生：环境法挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of the project was to investigate environmental law issues surrounding the regeneration of brownfield land. Design/methodology/approach - Following a literature review, an inductive approach and an interpretivist epistemology with a phenomenological focus were chosen. A constructionist ontological stance was adopted. A qualitative paradigm was selected to explore the issues in a focus group comprising industry, legal expert and academic contributors. Findings - A critique of the literature on relevant environmental law issues including contaminated land, waste management, water pollution, environmental impact assessment (EIA) issues and finally the political agenda is presented. Contaminated land, waste management, regulators and legislation were discussed in the focus group. The participants contributed their experiences and proposed several changes to environmental law. However, water pollution and EIAs were not considered by the contributors. Research limitations/implications - Developers face many environmental law challenges when endeavouring to progress housing on brownfield sites including contaminated land, funding, waste treatment permits, water pollution and EIAs. The benefits of the remediation of brownfield sites for housing seem to be a political priority, but reform of challenging environmental law issues less so. Understandably, the legal complexities of Brexit will take precedence. Originality/value - The literature review identified the need to research the experience of brownfield environmental law challenges and recommended changes to environmental law from industry, legal experts and academia.
机译：目的 - 该项目的目的是调查围绕布朗菲尔德土地再生的环境法问题。设计/方法论/方法 - 选择了文献综述，归纳方法和具有现象学重点的解释性认识论。采用了建筑主义的本体论立场。选择了定性范式来探索包括行业，法律专家和学术贡献者的焦点小组中的问题。调查结果 - 对有关环境法问题的文献的批评，包括受污染的土地，废物管理，水污染，环境影响评估（EIA）问题，最后提出了政治议程。焦点小组讨论了受污染的土地，废物管理，监管机构和立法。参与者贡献了他们的经验，并提出了对环境法的几次更改。但是，贡献者不考虑水污染和EIA。研究局限性/含义 - 开发人员在努力在棕地遗址上进行住房的进展，包括受污染的土地，资金，废物处理许可，水污染和EIA。补救棕地遗址的好处似乎是政治优先事项，但对挑战性环境法问题的改革却少得多。可以理解的是，英国脱欧的法律复杂性将优先。独创性/价值 - 文献评论确定了研究棕地环境法挑战的经验，并建议对行业，法律专家和学术界的环境法进行更改。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号