• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >The competency movement in the health professions: ensuring consistent standards or reproducing conventional domains of practice?
【24h】

The competency movement in the health professions: ensuring consistent standards or reproducing conventional domains of practice?

机译：卫生专业领域的能力运动：确保一致的标准或重现常规的实践领域？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Efforts to define professional competence are growing among the health professions. Increasing numbers of professional groups, regulatory bodies and government agencies are introducing specialty, professional and interprofessional competencies (e.g., Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada CanMeds Competency Framework 2005; The Public Health Agency of Canada Core Competencies for Public Health Practice 2007; NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement Medical Leadership Competency Framework 2009). While there are a number of benefits derived from clearly defining scope of practice and identifying appropriate indicators of acceptable performance, the competency movement may also be viewed as a trend that reproduces conventional practices, limits innovation and interferes with interprofessional practice.
机译：在卫生专业人员中，定义专业能力的工作正在不断增加。越来越多的专业团体，监管机构和政府机构引入了专业，专业和专业间的能力（例如，加拿大皇家内科医生与外科医生学院的CanMeds能力框架2005;加拿大公共卫生局，2007年公共卫生实践核心能力; NHS创新与改善研究所医疗领导能力框架（2009）。虽然清楚地定义实践范围并确定可接受的绩效的适当指标会带来很多好处，但是胜任力移动也可以被视为一种趋势，可以复制传统实践，限制创新并干扰跨行业实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号