• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in health sciences education: theory and practice >Psychometrics and its discontents: an historical perspective on the discourse of the measurement tradition
【24h】

Psychometrics and its discontents: an historical perspective on the discourse of the measurement tradition

机译：心理计量学及其不满：测量传统话语的历史视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Psychometrics has recently undergone extensive criticism within the medical education literature. The use of quantitative measurement using psychometric instruments such as response scales is thought to emphasize a narrow range of relevant learner skills and competencies. Recent reviews and commentaries suggest that a paradigm shift might be presently underway. We argue for caution, in that the psychometrics approach and the quantitative account of competencies that it reflects is based on a rich discussion regarding measurement and scaling that led to the establishment of this paradigm. Rather than reflecting a homogeneous discipline focused on core competencies devoid of consideration of context, the psychometric community has a history of discourse and debate within the field, with an acknowledgement that the techniques and instruments developed within psychometrics are heuristics that must be used pragmatically.
机译：最近，心理计量学在医学教育文献中受到了广泛的批评。人们认为使用心理测量仪器（例如反应量表）进行定量测量的目的是强调相关学习者技能和能力的狭窄范围。最近的评论和评论表明，范式转换可能正在进行中。我们为谨慎起见而辩护，因为心理计量学方法及其所反映的胜任力的定量解释是基于关于度量和标度的广泛讨论而导致的，该讨论导致了该范式的建立。心理计量学界没有反映出侧重于核心能力的同类学科，而没有考虑上下文，而是在该领域内进行了讨论和辩论的历史，并承认在心理学计量学中开发的技术和手段是启发式的，必须务实地使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号